STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Anticipatory Bail Plea of T P Noushad Dismissed

The Government Pleader submitted that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, considering the nature of allegations

Published: 30th November 2013 11:11 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th November 2013 11:11 AM   |  A+A-

The Kerala High Court on Friday dismissed the anticipatory bail plea of T P Noushad of Chevayoor, a relative of former minister and CPM leader Elamaram Kareem, who is an accused in four cheating cases registered in Kozhikode district.

Dismissing the plea, Justice Thomas P Joseph observed that the matter requires investigation and also directed the agency to look into the allegations.

Opposing the plea, Senior Government Pleader C Rasheed submitted that only a few days were available for the investigation, as the proceedings in the case were earlier stayed by the High Court.

After cases were registered for the offence under Sections 420 (Cheating), 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 506 (criminal intimidation) of the IPC, Noushad had approached the High Court seeking to quash criminal cases of cheating registered in connection with quarry deal.

The Court had initially stayed all the proceedings and later these were dismissed. However, the police did not get enough time to investigate the case.

The Government Pleader also submitted that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, considering the nature of allegations.

The Government Pleader pointed out that the accused cheated the complainants by introducing himself as a personal staff member and close relative of Elamaram Kareem.

The complainants ran a quarry and Naushad had cheated them by taking over their properties on the promise of giving a share in his crusher company.

It was also agreed that the partnership should be on 50:50 basis.

However, the entire property was registered in the name of Noushad and he did not given the share offered to the complainants.

The Government Pleader submitted that the court had already found that there was prima facie case against Noushad with a Bench dismissing the criminal miscellaneous petition filed by him observing that some offences were evident.

The police also suspect that the accused had forged documents to form the crusher company, the Government Pleader submitted.

The court also directed the police to check the authenticity of the documents.

Counsel for the petitioner Gopalakrishna Kurup submitted that the complaints are identical and in the same handwriting and this reveals a concerted effort to implicate someone in the case.

Gopalakrishna Kurup  also submitted that these people had come together under the influence of some people involved in real estate business.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp