What is Your Idea of Indianisation,Really?

Almost everybody believes that Indian culture and traditions have to be a part of our curriculum but how much more different is this idea of Indianising our education system, wonders Blessy Mathew Prasad.

Published: 15th February 2016 06:00 AM  |   Last Updated: 12th February 2016 11:26 PM   |  A+A-

There is probably no disagreement about the fact that education shapes minds and ideologies. But with all the recent demands for the ‘Indianisation’ of education, the question really is what ‘Indianisation’ means. Should students be ripped of the chance to understand their history, conflicts that arose and foundations of modern India?

These were some of the questions debated at the ThinkEdu Conclave by a panel of erudite and well-read speakers who quoted from a variety of literature and delved deep into history to make the points that they were pushing for. “There are issues about the foundations on which you build the future, what are those foundations, how did we get there, was there exploitation, injustice and violence in the past, how was it perpetrated and how was it justified. All those questions need to be answered before we can go forward. At the same time, we should also make sure that we don’t get caught up in some divisive story about something that happened thousands of years ago. We have to focus on what do we do to make India a better place, how do we make education come alive in such a manner that people can relate to the world in which we live,” said Rajeev Gowda, MP.

He added, “Too often, because our higher education has not been Indianised enough, we haven’t got enough of an understanding of our context, and conflicts. If we talk about urban planning today and don’t understand that villages were built in segregated ways, that some communities had issues about not getting enough access to facilities, all that is necessary to build newer cities. So there is a need for some amount of historical knowledge, but we don’t want to talk in glib ways.” He reasoned that it made sense to take a good, hard , long look back at the history that our country has amassed over the years, but without understanding the context in which that history was set, not too much could be made of the whole thing.

Anirban Ganguly, Director, Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee Research Foundation, on the other hand says the problem is not when there are too many different ideas, but when one idea continues to dominate and leaves no room for other ideas to develop. He says, “The problem is when one idea of India dominates and practises academic apartheid. And when that idea is no longer dominant, it accuses others of being intolerant. There has to be a certain amount of balance. You cannot practice academic apartheid for decades and not allow a certain conception of India to come out,” Academic apartheid has made a very selective reading of thinkers. There should be centres where we study the history of the communist party in India, where you study Dr Syama Prasad.” The lack of this whole support structure to best understand which ideas were most prevalent at a certain point in time is what is leading to a lot of confusion, and frequent imbalance.

Ritabrata Banerjee, Member of Parliament, Rajya Sabha says, “In the name of Indianisation, a lot of unfortunate things are going on.” He went on to detail how these were the reasons why a lot of instances of intolerance were being shown up all across the country.

Academic Apartheid

Whose India is it anyway? Rather, whose idea of India is it anyway? That was a contentious issue that got this as an answer from Anirban Ganguly,  “There has to be a certain amount of balance. You cannot practice academic apartheid for decades and not allow a certain conception of India to come out.”


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp