STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Netflix will continue to face 'Queen's Gambit' lawsuit from Georgian chess master Nona Gaprindashvili

As per Variety, Nona Gaprindashvili, who rose to prominence as a chess player in the Soviet Union in the 1960s, sued Netflix in federal court in September.

Published: 28th January 2022 11:53 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th January 2022 11:53 AM   |  A+A-

Netflix

Netflix.

By ANI

WASHINGTON: A request by Netflix to dismiss a lawsuit filed by a Georgian chess master who alleged that she was defamed in an episode of the Emmy winning show 'The Queen's Gambit,' has been refused.

As per Variety, Nona Gaprindashvili, who rose to prominence as a chess player in the Soviet Union in the 1960s, sued Netflix in federal court in September.

She took issue with a line in the series in which a character stated -- falsely -- that Gaprindashvili had "never faced men." Gaprindashvili argued that the line was "grossly sexist and belittling," noting that she had in fact faced 59 male competitors by 1968, the year in which the series was set.

Netflix sought to have the suit dismissed, arguing that the show is a work of fiction and that the First Amendment gives show creators broad artistic license.

ALSO READ | Netflix announces political drama series 'The Diplomat' 

But in a ruling on Thursday, US District Judge Virginia A. Phillips disagreed, finding that Gaprindashvili had made a plausible argument that she was defamed. Phillips also held that works of fiction are not immune from defamation suits if they disparage real people.

"Netflix does not cite, and the Court is not aware, of any cases precluding defamation claims for the portrayal of real persons in otherwise fictional works. The fact that the Series was a fictional work does not insulate Netflix from liability for defamation if all the elements of defamation are otherwise present," Phillips wrote, as per the legal documents obtained by Variety.

Based on a 1983 novel by Walter Tevis, 'The Queen's Gambit' follows a fictional American character, Beth Harmon, who becomes an international chess champion in the 1960s. In the final episode, set in Moscow, Harmon defeats a male competitor.

A chess announcer explains that her opponent underestimated her, "Elizabeth Harmon's not at all an important player by their standards. The only unusual thing about her, really, is her sex. And even that's not unique in Russia. There's Nona Gaprindashvili, but she's the female world champion and has never faced men."

Netflix argued that the show creators meant no offence to Gaprindashvili and that it had relied on two chess experts in an effort to get the details right.

"The Series' reference to Plaintiff was intended to recognize her, not disparage her," the streamer's lawyers argued as per Variety.

In her ruling, Phillips noted that the show's theme involves breaking gender barriers. But, as per the outlet, she said, the show could be seen as building up the achievement of the fictional Harmon by dismissing those of the real-life Gaprindashvili.

ALSO READ | Lawsuit against Netflix over '13 Reasons Why' suicide scene dismissed

"An average viewer easily could interpret the Line, as Plaintiff contends, as 'disparaging the accomplishments of Plaintiff' and 'carr[ying] the stigma that women bear a badge of inferiority' that fictional American woman Harmon, but not Plaintiff, could overcome. At the very least, the line is dismissive of the accomplishments central to Plaintiff's reputation," the judge wrote as per the legal documents obtained by Variety.

Phillips also ruled that viewers might leave the show with the false impression that Gaprindashvili had never faced men.

Netflix noted that 'The Queen's Gambit' featured a standard disclaimer, stating that "the characters and events depicted in this program are fictitious. No depiction of actual persons or events is intended."

But the judge ruled that was not enough to dispel the notion that the show was asserting a factual claim.

"In context, therefore, Netflix 'creat[ed] the impression that [it] was asserting objective facts,'" "Plaintiff sufficiently pleads falsity because the Line is 'reasonably susceptible of an interpretation which implies a provably false assertion of fact,'" Phillips wrote as per Variety. 



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp