ThinkEdu Conclave 2025: Cholas were comfortable with diversity, says author Anirudh Kanisetti

Kanisetti was speaking with Ravi Shankar, Consulting Editor of The Sunday Standard, during a session titled “Enigmatic Empires: Who Were the Cholas?”
Anirudh V Kanisetti, writer & researcher speaking with Ravi Shankar, Consulting Editor of The Sunday Standard, at the ThinkEdu Conclave in Chennai on Tuesday, January 28, 2025.
Anirudh V Kanisetti, writer & researcher speaking with Ravi Shankar, Consulting Editor of The Sunday Standard, at the ThinkEdu Conclave in Chennai on Tuesday, January 28, 2025.(Photo | Express)
Updated on
2 min read

CHENNAI: One of the most distinguishing features of the Chola Empire was their comfort with diversity. Instead of replacing existing cultures after conquest, the Cholas added a new layer to them which helped them to build a transregional empire, said author Anirudh Kanisetti at the second day of the ThinkEdu conclave on Tuesday.

Kanisetti was speaking with Ravi Shankar, Consulting Editor of The Sunday Standard, during a session titled “Enigmatic Empires: Who Were the Cholas?”

Highlighting the difference between Cholas and other empires, he said that Chaulukyas would defeat enemies, force tribute and appoint local puppet rulers. However, Cholas removed local dynasties and replaced them with princes from their own family and encouraged Tamil merchants to migrate and blend with local cultures which was new to South India at that time. This fostered strong logistical ties, enabling the Cholas to maintain control over distant regions and create a truly transregional empire. He also noted that unlike Mauryas or Guptas, he said the Cholas unified India's coast.

Talking about the influence of Cholas in the growth of Tamil, he said that the language became international with it being spoken in courts of South Karnataka and north Lanka. “We know that embassies from Cambodia and even China came to Chola court. It would not be ridiculous to expect that Tamil would have been heard in Angkor,” he said.

He also highlighted the influence of the Chola dowager queen and great-aunt of Sembiyan Mahadevi in the kingdom and establishing the Nataraja idol as an iconic symbol of India. Stating that Natarja, the Sembiyan Mahadevi’s favourite deity, was rarely depicted in temples on the Cauvery floodplain before her time, he said that the queen built 12 temples and contributed to many more, even beyond the Chola core territory during her tenure.

“She prominently featured the Nataraja idol on the southern side of the Vimana, crystallising its iconography and spreading its prominence. Over the Chola period, 3,000 bronze Nataraja idols were commissioned,” he said. While French sculptor Rodin and Indologists such as Ananda Coomaraswamy popularised these idols in the late 19th century, it all began with Sembiyan Mahadevi, a figure now little known outside Tamil Nadu at present, he said.

He added that however, there was bone chilling violence during the wars as stated in the Kalingattuparani by Tamil poet Jayankondar. When asked if the violence was experienced by the local population after the conquest, he said that there were primary sources that indicated some incidents, however, he would like it to be supported by archaeological evidence. “Cholas claim that they destroyed Anuradhapura in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankans also accused them of doing so. But archeological evidence shows it was not destroyed but abandoned,” he said. He also added that similarly it is difficult to be certain about Cholas destroying Jain Basandis in South Karnataka. He highlighted the importance of merchant corporations in ensuring that Cholas become a naval power.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com