Surveillance by Sensor

In contrast to camera-dependent apps requiring explicit permission for operation, these sensors operate surreptitiously, gathering data without user consent.
Representational image
Representational image
Updated on
2 min read

In George Orwell’s prophetic novel 1984, ubiquitous telescreens symbolise the ultimate intrusion into privacy. Though devoid of cameras, they possess the capability of covert surveillance. In a contemporary parallel, a recent study conducted by researchers at MIT sheds light on a similar notion. They have devised a method to exploit ambient light sensors, minute components intended to regulate screen brightness, effectively transforming them into a clandestine surveillance tool. .

Initially innocuous, ambient light sensors gauge the surrounding brightness, adjusting screen luminosity accordingly for optimal viewing. However, MIT’s Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (CSAIL) researchers reveal these sensors’ ability to capture images of their surroundings without overt camera functionality, posing a significant privacy risk that has largely gone unnoticed until now. In contrast to camera-dependent apps requiring explicit permission for operation, these sensors operate surreptitiously, gathering data without user consent.

Lead author Yang Liu, a PhD student at MIT’s Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and a CSAIL affiliate, elucidates, “Many assume these sensors are innocuous, always in operation. However, similar to telescreens, ambient light sensors passively gather information without consent, unlike apps that must request camera access. Our demonstrations underscore the potential imaging privacy threat posed by these sensors, especially when combined with display screens.”

The process of exploiting ambient light sensors is intricate yet ingenious. These sensors detect subtle fluctuations in light intensity caused by screen interactions. Through sophisticated algorithms, researchers map these variations onto a two-dimensional space, effectively reconstructing pixellated images of activities before the screen. While resulting images may lack the sharpness of conventional camera captures, they still encroach upon privacy boundaries, capable of various nefarious applications.

In their experiments, the MIT team utilised an Android tablet to conduct three demonstrations, capturing interactions ranging from a mannequin’s engagement with the device to nuanced human hand movements. These tests showcased the monitoring potential of gestures like swiping, scrolling, and tapping, transforming each touch into exploitable data points for potential hackers.

To mitigate these privacy concerns, the researchers propose several safeguarding measures. They advocate for stricter app permissions regarding ambient light sensors and reducing sensor precision and speed, making it arduous for unauthorised entities to capture detailed information. Although adjustments may entail performance trade-offs, consumers stand to gain enhanced privacy assurances. Furthermore, repositioning sensors on devices to avert direct user-facing orientation could deter unauthorised surveillance attempts. In many devices like smartphones or laptops, ambient light sensors are positioned adjacent to cameras, making them susceptible to exploitation.

While the concept of screens covertly monitoring user activities may evoke science fiction, the reality challenges established notions of privacy.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com