SC ultimatum to Sahara

Group faces criticism over delay in refunding ` 27,000 cr to investors

Published: 04th December 2012 10:16 AM  |   Last Updated: 04th December 2012 10:16 AM   |  A+A-

The Sahara Group has come in for sharp criticism from the Supreme Court on Monday for not refunding ` 27,000 crore to the investors.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice S S Nijjar and Justice J Chelameswar asked the Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Ltd (SIRECL) and the Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Ltd (SHICL) to tell by Tuesday whether the two companies would be able to refund the entire amount to their investors within a week.

Justice Kabir, who is normally unflappable, had some harsh words for the two companies for not carrying out the order of the apex court in this regard and said the petition cannot be entertained.

When senior counsel Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for one of the companies, tried to justify their failure to refund the entire amount, the Chief Justice said, “You are not entitled to any hearing. Your intention is very shaky. Your every step is shaky. We can’t interpret our order according to your need,” he remarked. “You are justifying your conduct which is not justifiable,” he added. Subramaniam said that the company complied with apex court’s order for furnishing all documents to the regulator Securities Exchange Board of India (SEBI). At this, the Bench asked him to furnish the details about the money refunded to investors.

“Don’t try to defend your conduct. It is unjustified. Unfortunately, you are doing so,” the Bench said. You have no intention of returning (the investors’ money). Returning some money to some investors is not complying with our orders,” the Bench said.

“Are you interested to pay or not. We are extending the time even though you are not entitled to,” the Bench said.

When senior counsel Mukul Rohtagi, appearing for another of Sahara Group company, stood up to make his submissions, the Bench asked him to sit down.

Senior counsel Arvind Dattar, appearing for the SEBI, opposed Sahara’s petition and submitted that it had already filed a contempt petition against them and that strong action should be taken against them.

The Bench, however, said it was more concerned about the common man, who has invested his money in the companies.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp