Khurshid didn't interfere in 2G probe, SC told

NEW DELHI: Government today filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court rejecting the allegation of interference by Law Minister Salman Khurshid in the investigation into 2G spectrum case as "

Published: 17th January 2012 10:15 PM  |   Last Updated: 16th May 2012 06:16 PM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: Government today filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court rejecting the allegation of interference by Law Minister Salman Khurshid in the investigation into 2G spectrum case as "baseless" and said it was not trying to "influence" the probe against Essar Group.

In the affidavit, the Centre said such allegations were being made to tarnish and discredit government's image and such a serious charge against the minister who is not a party to the matter was "impermissible" in law.

The centre filed a comprehensive affidavit in response to the notices that the probe agencies were allegedly going soft on companies like Essar, Loop and their promoters by not slapping corruption charges against them in the case arising out of the 2G spectrum scam.

The court had sought response on an application filed by an NGO, Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL), which also alleged that such a decision was "facilitated" by the intervention of CBI Director and Law Minister Salman Khurshid.

Brushing aside the allegations, the Centre's affidavit filed through advocate Wasim Ahmed Qadri, said "it is emphatically denied that the Law Minister is publicly giving clean chit to Essar/Loop. The entire matter is in the domain of the CBI and the court, which will take an independent view of all aspects of the matter."

It said that making "such serious allegations" against Khurshid and others, who are not a party to the case is "impermissible" in law and the application filed by the NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) are liable to be rejected.

The affidavit said "petitioners have made it a practice to make serious allegations against the functionaries of the Government holding high constitutional positions, one after another". .

The affidavit said the allegations "shows a design to tarnish their image and discredit the government, taking undue advantage of the wide publicity given to court proceedings including the baseless allegations made in such interim applications (IAs)".

Denying the allegation that Khurshid was publicly giving clean chit to Essar, the affidavit said the opinion of the Attorney General (AG) G E Vahanvati did not intend to interfere in the probe.

"This (AG's) opinion did not and was never intended to interfere with the investigation being done by the CBI. The applicants' plea that interference of an influential minister is evident, is baseless," the Centre said.

"CPIL is consistently opposed to the ruling party and have been adopting the devise of filing IAs ostensibly seeking permission to bring certain facts on record but in the applications or the affidavits filed in support thereof targeting individual ministers or the Attorney General or officers of CBI by name behind their back in flagrant breach of principles of natural justice.

The Centre said "a proceeding which started as public interest litigation is now turning out to be a political interest litigation".

The affidavit said all aspects were considered by the departments of Telecom and Company Affairs before granting approvals relating to acquisition of shares.

The Centre said it was for the investigating agency to consider all relevant facts and materials including those mentioned in the AG's opinion and take necessary steps and the NGO cannot assume a role of supervisors of the probe.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp