STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

2G: Hearing against Mittal postponed

Published: 09th April 2013 08:17 AM  |   Last Updated: 09th April 2013 08:17 AM   |  A+A-

The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned till April 16 the proceedings in the Special CBI Court against Bharti Cellular Limited’s Sunil Bharti Mittal in a case related to the 2G spectrum allocation in 2002.

A Bench of Chief Justice Altamas Kabir, Justice Anil R Dave and Justice Vikramajit Sen was hearing a petition filed by Mittal challenging the March 19 order summoning him as an accused in the corruption case dating back to the NDA regime.

Senior counsel Harish Salve, appearing for the Bharti boss, questioned the Special Court order, saying the CEOs of the telcos were summoned despite not being named as accused in the chargesheet.

“The chargesheet doesn’t name us as accused,” Salve pointed out. “Where is the chargesheet?”asked the Justice Kabir. “I don’t have it. I was not given,” Salve replied.

“I also find that the then MD of Hutchison Max Telecom was also summoned under similar circumstances.” The Chief Justice asked CBI counsel K K Venugopal how Mittal was summoned when his name did not figure in the chargesheet. “Can the Special Judge take cognisance at this stage?” he asked.

When Venugopal said “yes”, Jusitce Kabir corrected him saying, “he cannot”.

Venugopal contended that the court has a power under Section 319 of the Cr Pc to proceed against those who were not named as accused in chargesheet but appear to be guilty of the offence.

Venugopal cited some previous SC judgments to buttress his claim and said, “Let him go and argue his case before the Special Judge.”

The Bench asked Venugopal to file a short affidavit and asked Mittal to file a rejoinder to the CBI affidavit by Saturday.

On Salve’s request to adjourn the proceedings, Justice Kabir posted the matter to April 15 for further hearing. Justice Kabir did not entertain advocate Prashant Bhushan’s bid to implead in the case on behalf of the NGO ‘Telecom Watchdog’.  “What has the watchdog got to do with this case?” the Chief Justice of India asked the senior lawyer.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp