Bill to seize babu's illegal property gets nod

Also, stringent timeframe for getting sanction of competent authority to prosecute serving and retired bureaucrats

Published: 02nd May 2013 08:14 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd May 2013 08:15 AM   |  A+A-

Badly hit by allegations of corruption and cover-up, the Union Cabinet on Wednesday approved sweeping changes to the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, allowing for confiscation of illegally acquired property and time-bound prosecution of serving and retired public servants.

Despite the standoff between the Treasury benches and the main Opposition BJP, sources said, the government will try introduce the amended Bill during the ongoing session of Parliament.

Highlighting the two major points of amendment, Finance Minister P Chidambaram said after the Union Cabinet meeting that a provision has been incorporated to confiscate and forfeit property illegally acquired by a corrupt public servant.

Besides, a stringent time-frame has been set for getting sanction of competent authority to prosecute serving and retired bureaucrats and reasons will have to be specified giving the nod or refusing it.

Also for the first time, provision for liability of a commercial entity for failing to prevent bribery of a public servant has been incorporated in the Bill.

The Bill also seeks to lay down a clear definition of different forms of bribery in line with international practices, Chidambaram said.

However, special sanction will be required to prosecute ‘retired bureaucrats’ for alleged acts of omissions and commissions which bring relief which there at the moment.

Apparently, this is to ensure that retired bureaucrats do not face prosecution for decisions taken in good faith during their service period. But, Chidambaram added that now a time limit—three months—for grant or refusal for sanction of prosecution has been set.

The provision to introduce a time-line came following adverse comments made by the Supreme Court in 2011 in its judgment on a petition filed by Subramanian Swamy. This was in the contest of Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) not responding to an application of Swamy seeking to prosecute former telecom minister A Raja in the 2G spectrum scam.

At present, the government’s protection in the form of prosecution sanction does not extend to retired bureaucrats.

A need was felt to bring the amendment to extend this protection to retired officials so that it would be mandatory for the prosecuting agency to get prior sanction before prosecuting them for something which they might have done with good intention while in office.

Chidambaram said now a “clear criteria”, procedure and time limit for grant or refusal of sanction of prosecution have been set.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp