Punjab HC Defers Hearing on Ashutosh Case for December 15

A Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Raj Mohan Singh postponed the decision after it was brought to its notice that the Punjab government has filed a plea saying that the implementation of the court's earlier order to perform the last rites could lead a law and order problem.

CHANDIGARH: Punjab and Haryana High Court today deferred to December 15 the hearing on appeals filed before it in connection with performing of last rites of Ashutosh Maharaj, the head of Nurmahal-based Divya Jyoti Jagriti Sansthan (DJJS).

A Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Raj Mohan Singh postponed the decision after it was brought to its notice that the Punjab government has filed a plea saying that the implementation of the court's earlier order to perform the last rites could lead a law and order problem.

However, the Punjab government's plea could not be listed and therefore for a consolidated hearing on the issue the Bench directed to place all the appeals together for hearing on next Monday, defence said.

The state government contended that the role of the government comes into play only if a body is unidentified or unclaimed and as such, the order passed by the single judge requires to be reconsidered.

Ashutosh's body has been kept in a freezer since January after he was declared clinically dead by doctors.

Meanwhile, appeal filed by DJJS, which challenged the High Court's December 1 order, said that the courts were not "competent" to distinguish between a 'naturally dead body' and a body in 'samadhi' (deep meditation).

The DJJS also said in its petition that it has not pleaded before the court whether Ashutosh was dead or not and the court "had gone beyond the scope of the pleadings".

The 'dera' pointed out that the High Court had "erred" in concluding that Ashutosh had "no life" and deserved to be declared dead, saying that none of the parties had sought such a declaration.

On the other hand, Bihar native Dalip Kumar Jha, who claims to be Ashutosh's son, has sought handing over the body.

Jha said that the December 1 order of the court, in which it said that Jha failed to produce "sufficient evidence" to prove that he was Ashutosh's son, was "erroneous".

Both the parties have also contended that the court did not give them "sufficient" time to file an appeal against the December 1 order.

On December 1, the High Court had constituted a committee led by District Magistrate of Jalandhar and directed it to cremate Ashutosh within 15 days.

It had also directed the government to oversee the compliance of the order.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com