DDCA Row Echoes in Parliament; Kirti Azad Joins Congress Against Jaitley

Row over DDCA financial bungling resonated in Parliament with Kirti embarrasses ruling side demands SIT probe, Cong press for Jaitley\'s resignation.

Published: 21st December 2015 03:04 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st December 2015 04:06 PM   |  A+A-


Arun Jaitley reaches Patiala House Court to file criminal defamation case against Delhi CM & other AAP leaders. (ANI)


NEW DELHI: The row over alleged financial bungling in DDCA resonated in Parliament today with BJP member Kirti Azad embarrassing the ruling side by demanding time-bound SIT probe while Congress pressed for resignation of Finance Minister Arun Jaitley who dismissed charges against him as "baseless" and "wrong".


LS Adjourned Briefly as Congress Asks Jaitley to Quit Over DDCA 

Congress staged a walkout in Lok Sabha which was led by party chief Sonia Gandhi.

While the Rajya Sabha was adjourned repeatedly over the issue, in the Lok Sabha, Kirti Azad, a known detractor of Jaitley, egged on Congress to seek a time-bound SIT probe. Congress members were already shouting slogans in the Well, demanding resignation of Jaitley, who formerly headed the DDCA.

Ruling out Jaitley's resignation, Parliamentary Affairs Minister M Venkaiah Naidu said that the Finance Minister is known for his "impeccable character, honesty and maintaining high standards in public life".

Jaitley, on his part, said, "The charges (against me) are baseless and wrong. This is all I have to say."

The Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) report did not find any fault with the expenditure and "accepted" the cost incurred, he said while giving a detailed account of the construction work at Ferozshah Kotla ground which is under scanner.

Kirti Azad was apparently not impressed by Jaitley's defence that SFIO probe found nothing wrong, saying it had looked only into the civil matters and that recently a CBI had issued a notice to DDCA.

The issue was raised in the Lok Sabha by K C Venugopal of Congress who claimed that there were "gross irregularities" in Delhi and District Cricket Association (DDCA) when Jaitley headed it and alleged his involvement.

He said the construction work at Ferozshah Kotla had cost Rs 114 cr against the estimate of Rs 24 cr and alleged that it was "forced escalation" and "there was no record of tender" in many cases.

"A laptop was hired for Rs 36,000 for a day, printer for Rs 3000 and a 'puja ki thali' for Rs 5,000 for a day. 14 companies did not exist or information about them was not correct," Venugopal alleged.

Making a reference to Kirti Azad's press conference yesterday, he said the BJP MP gave "solid evidence" of irregularities in DDCA.

"He (Jaitley) is also involved in the scam. We demand a JPC probe and resignation of Jaitley," he said.

The Finance Minister immediately rose to reply and gave a detailed account of the expenditure incurred on the construction work and contrasted it with the much-higher cost of renovating Jawahar Lal Nehru Stadium and Dhyanchand National Stadium during the Congress-led UPA tenure.

While noting that it cost Rs 114 cr to build Kotla stadium, which was merely a "field" prior to the construction, Jaitley attacked Congress, saying the Nehru stadium was renovated at a cost of Rs 900 cr and the Dhyanchand stadium for Rs 600 cr.

The Kotla stadium has a seating capacity of 42000, the Dhyanchad staidum steats only 14000 people.

As Congress members began their protest in the midst of his reply, an upset Jaitley asked them to sit down, saying "you should have courage to listen. Why do you find my reply so inconvenient? It is not a charge against you."

Accusing the opposition of dragging the Finance Minister's name for "short term politics", Naidu said Jaitley had "no role" in the alleged irregularities.

Taking a dig at Congress, he said Jaitley was not a minister in 2013 when the irregularities were found, noting that it was Congress which was in power then.

He said several cricketers had only yesterday "paid compliments" to Jaitley for the work he has done in promoting the cause of the game.

Congress staged a walkout, inviting loud boos from the treasury benches.

Jaitley said allegations have been levelled outside the House too and "I have taken whatever remedies are available to me", an apparent reference to his filing of a defamation case against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal and five other AAP leaders in Delhi High Court.

Giving a detailed account of the expenditure, he said Delhi did not have a stadium and DDCA proposed two measures to raise money as the Board of Control for Crikcet in India's (BCCI) infrastructure subsidy was limited to only Rs 4 cr.

DDCA raised Rs 35 crores by selling advance tickets of corporate boxes and siganges, he said, adding that by the time the money was raised, BCCI also hiked the subsidy to Rs 50 cr as it had begun earning more money.

"So we decided to rebuild the entire stadium," he said amid protests.

He said a public sector understaking EPIL carried out the civil works costing around Rs 57-58 crore and 43 other works were given to those who were predominantly their sub-contractors.

"No SFIO probe gave report that the wrong expenditure was made. It accepted the expenditure," Jaitley said.

Kirti Azad, who spoke after Jaitley even when many BJP leaders were seen asking him to sit down, said if everything was alright about DDCA works, then the CBI would not have given a notice to it on October 23.

The BJP member noted that the Modi government was fighting against corruption but at the same time, said, "They (Congress) should demand a time-bound probe, CBI, SIT probe."

Several union ministers, including Kalraj Mishra, Narendra Singh Tomar, J P Nadda, Rajiv Pratap Rudy and Jayant Sinha, were seen protesting against Congress' allegations.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp