STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Lalit Got Rs 125 cr Illegally in IPL Media Pact: ED

Lalit is a beneficiary of Rs 125 crore out of Rs 425 crore that MSM paid to WSG under the garb of facilitation fee, says ED; Why attacking only me, asks LaMo

Published: 02nd July 2015 04:57 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd July 2015 04:57 AM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI:  Lalitgate is now moving away from virtual world with the Enforcement Directorate invoking the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) along with IPC Sections 420 and 120 B to further investigate the BCCI-World Sports Group-Multi Screen Media rights contract, which the agency alleges was inked in an unauthorised manner.

In February 2015, the ED issued showcause notices under provisions about forex violations to former BCCI chief N Srinivasan, ex-IPL boss Lalit Modi, IPL COO Sundar Raman, MSM CEO Manjit Singh, BCCI, Multi Screen Media (MSM-Singapore, a division of Sony) and World Sports Group, Mauritius. The ED alleged that the payment of a `425-crore fee by MSM to WSG was under the garb of a facilitation fee and had noted Lalit as a suspected beneficiary of `125 crore out of the amount.

For ED sleuths, who are in the process of collecting evidence from Singapore and Mauritius through Letters Rogatory, it will be a monumental task since the decisions related to the IPL were finally inked by a governing council and this particular contract agreement of 2008 between BCCI and WSG was one of the several decisions where the ED had unearthed forex violations.

lailt.JPG“All those named in the first FIR in 2012 as well as others issued showcause notices after the FEMA probe will be investigated further. The case is already under the adjudication process, sbut with the serious section slapped against accused, the agency can identify and move to attach the properties if required,” an ED officer said. As per Section 4 of PMLA, “whoever commits the offence of money laundering shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine.” However, agency officials said the case was still weak as far as Lalit’s extradition was concerned as there were several gaps in the evidence collected in the case. This may not stand court scrutiny in the UK, where Modi is staying after he left India in 2010.

Meanwhile, Lalit dared the ED officials to book others too and not selectively target him in the cases.

“My query to the ED: DO you have the courage to call BJP’s #ArunJaitley or #RajeevShukla from INC-Congress even today?” he tweeted.

He made a remark on a FEMA case related to moving the IPL to South Africa. Even though ED notices were also issued to Shashank Manohar, N Srinivasan, M P Pandove, Ratnakar Shetty, Prasanna Kannan and Sundar Raman but only his passport was revoked, he said.

“Out of 8 noticees, I was the only one SINGLED OUT! Only my passport was revoked. Why just me? Out of 8 noticees, only 1 person wrongly portrayed as an economic offender. What about other 8 noticees?” he said in a series of tweets while making public all ED showcause notices.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp