Sedition Circular Got Lost in Translation: Maharashtra Government

Published: 22nd September 2015 08:56 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd September 2015 08:56 PM   |  A+A-


MUMBAI: The BJP-led Maharashtra government today said that its circular on sedition, which has triggered a row for ostensibly trying to invoke sedition charges for criticising the political establishment, got lost in translation and promised to bring a revised version.

The admission came close on the heels of the Bombay High Court today restraining the government from acting on the August 27 circular, issued to prevent misuse of section 124A of IPC which deals with sedition, till the state files a reply to two petitions challenging the constitutional validity thereof. "The circular that we had issued pertaining to sedition charges was based on the judgement of the (high) court (delivered) in English. But we were then accused of curtailing the freedom of people. We have read the circular and the Home department has nothing to do with the translation. It was translated by the Law and Judiciary department," said Additional Chief Secretary K P Bakshi.

He was referring to the high court order earlier on cartoonist Assem Trivedi who was arrested on September 8, 2012, on the basis of an FIR under section 124A and other provisions of IPC for cartoons published on "India Against Corruption" website, and later granted bail. The circular stoked a huge controversy as it apparently tried to invoke sedition charges for criticising the political leaders and received flak from all sections.

Bakshi also said that the revised version of the circular will soon be brought out and submitted to the HC. "Our view is that the Law and Judiciary department got confused with certain sentences of the order while translating it in Marathi. The Law and Judiciary department has now suggested corrections and soon the revised version of the circular will be presented before the court," he said.

The circular had stated that those attempting to bring into "hatred or contempt, dissatisfaction and provoking violence" against the central or state government will be slapped with sedition charges. Despite the heat generated by the circular, the government stuck to it while maintaining that it only translated the court's guidelines from English to Marathi.

The opposition has accused the government of trying to curtail the fundamental right of people to freedom of speech through the circular. The constitutional validity of section 124A of IPC was challenged in the HC by two petitions--one by Trivedi and three others while the other by advocate Narendra Sharma. 

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp