Gujarat 2002 Gulberg Case: Defence Sticks to 'Reaction-to-firing' Theory

After the defence provided clarification on some points as sought by him, the judge P B Desai concluded the hearing. 

Published: 28th September 2015 09:29 PM  |   Last Updated: 29th September 2015 01:03 AM   |  A+A-


AHMEDABAD: The special judge hearing the case related to the 2002 Gulberg Housing Society riot, in which 69 people including former Congress MP Ehsan Jafri were killed here, today said he would start writing the verdict now.

After the defence provided clarification on some points as sought by him, the judge P B Desai concluded the hearing.     

He directed both the prosecution and the defence lawyers to remain present to answer the court's queries whenevercalled.     

In the final submission today, the defence refuted the prosecution's theory of prior conspiracy, and reiterated that the mob turned violent only after Jafri fired several rounds at it from his revolver.     

Last week, advocate S M Vora, representing the riot survivors, had argued that the attack was a pre-planned criminal conspiracy. The accused police officer K G Erda, the then police inspector of Meghaninagar station, did not stop the rioters from entering the Society, he had alleged.     

Today, defence lawyer Abhay Bhardwaj argued that the mob, which had begun to gather outside on the morning of February 28, 2002 (a day after the Godhra train burning incident), turned violent at around 2 pm when Jafri fired at people. One person was killed and several others were injured, he said.     

About 15,000 people had gathered outside the Society but nobody had called them there through any conspiracy and the people had gathered on their own, advocate Bhardwaj said.    

Had there been any common intention to kill the Muslims (in the Society), then the mob would have done that in the morning and would not have waited till afternoon, he said.

Also, the mob didn't harm several Muslims who entered the Society or left during this period, which proves that there was no common intention to kill Muslims, he said.     

The people went berserk only at around 2 pm after Jafri opened fire on them, claimed Bhardwaj, adding that what happened was only a reaction.     

Regarding inspector Erda who was on the spot, the defence lawyer said Erda tried his best to control the situation and that was why no violence took place between 8 am to 2 pm.     

Call logs of Fire Department prove that Erda made three phone calls to demand fire tenders after the situation went out of control, he said.     

The trial of Gulberg Society riot case, one of the most notorious cases of 2002 Gujarat riots, lasted for six years during which 338 witnesses testified.     

It was one of the nine cases related to Gujarat riots probed by the Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team.    

There are a total of 66 accused. Nine of them are behind the bars for the last 14 years while others are out on bail. 


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp