Coming, a permanent tribunal to solve inter-state river disputes

Govt to introduce a bill in next Parliament session to form a single tribunal to resolve all conflicts  between states on sharing river water; experts slam the move, say it could further delay relief

Published: 19th December 2016 01:51 AM  |   Last Updated: 19th December 2016 11:27 AM   |  A+A-

Krishna River02

File Photo for representation purpose | EPS

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI/CHENNAI: In a major development, the Centre has decided to accelerate solutions to inter-state river water disputes by setting up a single, permanent tribunal to hear all such cases. Besides the tribunal, the government has also proposed to float some benches by amending the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 to look into disputes as and when required. Unlike the Tribunal, the benches will cease to exist once the disputes are resolved.

“There will be only one permanent Tribunal with retired Supreme Court judge as its chairperson. There will be benches formed as and when required. The benches though will be wound up once a dispute is resolved,” Water Resources Ministry secretary Shashi Shekhar said. The Cabinet has already cleared it and the Bill will be introduced in next Parliament session.

Water management experts and activists in Tamil Nadu have slammed the move as they feel the Centre has scuttled the efforts of the Supreme Court to form the Cauvery Management Board as mandated by the Cauvery River Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT).

According to A Veerappan, retired Special Chief Engineer, TN PWD, “The Centre’s efforts to set up a single, permanent tribunal to adjudicate inter-state water disputes will undermine the principles of federalism and will make things more complicated instead of resolving them.”

Meanwhile, Mannargudi S Ranganathan, one of the original petitioners in the Cauvery dispute says, “centralised tribunal would not yield the desired results and would only further delay the implementation of final awards of existing tribunals.”

Water management experts say this could cause long legal battles. “It would result in an enormous legal battle,” says Dr S Janakarajan, attached to the Madras Institute of Development Studies.

“When even the independent tribunals could not deliver in time, how can you expect a single tribunal to deliver in three years? All awards, even if delivered in time, would land up in the Supreme Court. Most important, it is unjustifiable to include all existing disputes in the new scheme,” he said.

(With inputs from T Muruganantham, R Sivakumar, S Deepak Karthik and Nirupama Viswanathan)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp