SC to examine if its interference on triple talaq violates rights

Court says as the issue affects large number of people, it has to be seen in light of earlier verdicts before deciding on setting up Constitution bench for the case

Published: 30th June 2016 06:07 AM  |   Last Updated: 30th June 2016 06:07 AM   |  A+A-

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Wednesday said it will first examine to what extent it can step in to see whether Muslim laws governing family issues interfere with Constitutional rights. The apex court’s observation came when it was hearing pleas to end the age-old practice of allowing Muslim men to divorce their wives by saying ‘talaq’ thrice.

According to the Constitution, Muslims can regulate matters such as marriage, divorce and inheritance through their own civil code. “It is an important issue affecting a large number of people. We will examine the legal provisions,” Chief Justice of India T S Thakur remarked adding that the issue of triple talaq has to be studied on the touchstone of Constitutional framework and earlier verdicts and it will first decide that before constituting a five-judge Constitution bench.

The court’s remarks came when the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) pleaded that such personal laws were based on the tenets of Islam and the judiciary had no power to adjudicate on their validity in the face of women’s fundamental right to equality.

“We are straightaway not jumping to any conclusion. It has to be seen if there is a need for any further consideration of law by the Constitution Bench,” the Bench, also comprising Justice A M Khanwilker, said while asking the parties to get ready for a debate on the scope of judicial review of judgments on ‘triple talaq’. “Personal law has to be tested on the touchstone of constitutional framework,” it said, while stressing that it’s a very important issue affecting a large section of people and there are very strong views from both sides.

The Bench, which posted the matter for further hearing on September 6, said legal propositions for determination have to be worked out.During the hearing, senior advocate Indira Jaising referred to an old verdict of the Bombay High Court holding that the Personal Law regime cannot be subject to fundamental rights.

The court was hearing a batch of PILs, including a suo motu petition, for and against such laws.

The apex court had earlier sought the Centre’s response on a plea challenging the Constitutional validity of Muslim practices of polygamy, triple talaq (talaq-e-bidat) and ‘nikah halala’. Talaq-e-bidat relates to a Muslim man divorcing his wife by pronouncing more than one talaq in a single tuhr (the period between two menstruations), or in a tuhr after coitus, or pronouncing an irrevocable instantaneous divorce at one go (unilateral triple-talaq).

Among the petitioners are two Muslim women who challenged the validity of ‘triple talaq’, polygamy and remarriage restrictions.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp