STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

CBI Separately Probing Financial Side in Sheena Case: Official

The second charge sheet did not mention details of the financial transactions and the agency had then indicated it may submit another document in future.

Published: 01st March 2016 10:33 PM  |   Last Updated: 01st March 2016 10:33 PM   |  A+A-

By PTI

MUMBAI: CBI is separately probing the financial angle in the sensational Sheena Bora murder case in which former media baron Peter Mukerjea and his wife Indrani are among the accused, a top agency official said today.

"We are separately probing the financial angle in the Sheena Bora murder case," the official said here. Besides Peter and Indrani, her former husband Sanjeev Khanna and ex-driver Shyam Rai are also accused in the case, in which the central agency has filed two charge sheets. All accused are in jail under judicial custody. Sheena, Indrani's daughter from an earlier relationship, was murdered on April 24, 2012 and her body was burnt before it was dumped in a forest in adjoining Raigad district of Maharashtra.

The murder came to light in August last year and it was initially probed by Mumbai Police before being handed over to CBI in September. In the second charge sheet filed in mid-February, CBI claimed the 24-year-old was killed as her relationship with Rahul, Peter's son, was strongly disapproved by his father and Indrani. Both Peter and Indrani were part of the murder plot, it said.

Sheena was working with Mumbai Metro before she went missing in April, 2012. The first charge sheet was filed on November 19 by CBI and it named Indrani, Khanna and Rai as accused. The document, running into more than 1,000 pages and containing statements of 150 witnesses, 200 documents and seven statements recorded before a magistrate, was submitted before Magistrate R V Adone at Esplanade court in South Mumbai.

The same day Peter was arrested for his alleged role in the murder and his name figured in the second document. He was in CBI custody for two weeks before being sent to judicial custody.

The second charge sheet did not mention details of the financial transactions and the agency had then indicated it may submit another document in future.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp