Ghost of transparency pops up again as SC casts aside seniority

Six Chief Justices of High Courts shortlisted for elevation, ignoring senior Madras and Delhi Chief Justices.

Published: 27th October 2016 05:31 AM  |   Last Updated: 27th October 2016 03:25 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court2PTI

Supreme Court | File Photo

Express News Service

After Supreme Court judge J Chelameshwar raised questions about the lack of transparency in appointment of judges to constitutional courts and refused to be a party to such a process, the apex court has not made any headway in regard to filling vacancies in the top court of the country.

Informed sources said a meeting of the Supreme Court Collegium was scheduled twice this month — first on October 18 and again on October 25 — but it did not take place for unknown reasons.

Early this month, Chief Justice T S Thakur wrote to Justice Chelameshwar suggesting that he attend the meeting of the Collegium to consider six names for Supreme Court judgeship, failing which the latter could give his opinion in writing. Justice Chelameshwar stuck to the position he had taken earlier — that he would not attend Collegium meetings but give his opinion in writing if asked to. He reportedly did offer his comments though it is not known what position he has taken in respect of the names under consideration. 

The six Chief Justices of High Courts shortlisted for elevation to the apex court are: Justices Manjula Chellur (Mumbai), Deepak Gupta (Punjab & Haryana), Navin Sinha (Rajasthan), R Subhash Reddy (Gujarat), Paul Vasantha Kumar (J&K) and K M Joseph (Uttarakhand).

With two sitting judges — justices A R Dave and S K Singh — retiring in November, vacancies in the Supreme Court will rise to seven. Interestingly, this time too questions are likely to pop up pertaining to the seniority of the judges to be elevated. In fact, one of the many issues raised by Justice Chelameshwar in his dissenting judgment in the National Judicial Accountability Commission case pertained to seniority. He pointed out that the process was such that none including those in the Collegium would know why a senior judge has been left out in preference for a relatively junior one.

Among the six names being considered for elevation now, some have been a chief justice of a High Court for some months while judges who have served two or three years do not figure. One of them is Justice S K Kaul, currently the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court. Prior to his shift to Madras HC in July 2014, he was the CJ of Punjab & Haryana HC. There are a few others in the same bracket such as Delhi CJ G Rohini.

This was one of the points raised by the Centre when the Supreme Court sought its involvement in evolving a revised Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) for appointment of judges. The Centre suggested that the Collegium record in writing the reasons for overlooking seniors and communicate them with its recommendations to the President. The SC reportedly did not agree to the suggestion. And so the revised MoP continues to be stuck with the executive and the judiciary not on the same page.

No headway in filling vacancies in apex court 
A meeting of the SC Collegium was scheduled twice in Oct but didn’t take place for unknown reasons.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp