STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Singur Tata Nano controversy: How agriculture paid the costliest price for the world's cheapest car

Here’s the political outcome of an issue that eventually damaged the reputation of both the Left government and the Tatas.

Published: 02nd September 2016 04:01 AM  |   Last Updated: 02nd September 2016 05:22 PM   |  A+A-

Nano_PTI_File

The Supreme Court setting aside the land acquisition by the previous Left Front government in West Bengal for the Nano car plant brings to a flashpoint an issue that had been simmering since 2008. Here’s the political outcome of an issue that eventually damaged the reputation of both the Left government and the Tatas.

THE SINGUR CONUNDRUM

Who acquired the land and why?

As Tata motors announced their world’s cheapest car, Nano, they proposed a factory at Singur in Hooghly district. Soon, Singur became the focus of international attention as the cars were scheduled to roll out into the market by 2008.

Why the controversy?

Around 997 acres of multi-crop farmland was forcibly acquired by the ruling party under the colonial Land Acquisition Act 1894. Anger brewed among the local population who depended on agriculture for their livelihood. While 15,000 depended on the land for agriculture, Tata managed to create only 1,000 jobs, many of which were offered outside of the village. Also environmental activists protested that the project would degrade the fertile land.

The case

The Land Acquisition Act 1894 received criticism from activists for but also from economists for its archaic system that potentially led to the economic slowdown. Even if one calls it the idiocy of the legislature, allegations were still thrown at the Left government for not following provisions of the Land act. Suprisingly, the Tatas officially decided to leave Singur on October 3. Eventually, the Kolkata High Court conceded that the West Bengal government’s decision was illegal. After an unsuccessful appeal, even the Supreme Court has declared that due processes and procedures were not followed.

The political calculus

The Trinamool Congress (TMC) was slowly getting a stronghold in West Bengal after the Nandigram incident, where 14 villagers protesting against a chemical factory were killed by the state police. TMC went against Buddhadeb Bhattacharya’s government with their “Save Farmland” movement which received massive support from unwilling farmers and notable environmental activists. Eventually Mamata’s party won the 2011 election and also retained power by a thumping majority in 2016, including in the Singur and Nandigram seats.

Where did the Nano factory go?

After Ratan Tata’s decision to move the factory outside Bengal, the then Gujarat Chief Minister, Narendra Modi sent an SMS to him saying ‘Suswagatham’ and fourteen months later a new Nano factory was built in Sanand. Ironically, the 1100 acres of land in Sanand also included fertile agricultural lands and the Tatas had to face another land acquisition controversy. However, the protests ended after the Gujarat government compensated the farmers by paying them four-times above the market price.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp