Dialogue not possible unless violence stops in Jammu and Kashmir: Supreme Court

The SC said no meaningful dialogue is possible in Jammu and Kashmir unless violence stops in the strife-torn Valley.

Published: 21st August 2017 10:08 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st August 2017 10:08 PM   |  A+A-

For representational purposes (File | PTI)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: No meaningful dialogue is possible in Jammu and Kashmir unless violence stops in the strife-torn Valley, the Supreme Court said today.

"Talks with whom? No talk can take place unless the violence stops," a bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice D Y Chandrachud said.

The court was hearing the appeal of the Bar Association Executive Member against the September 22 order of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court order.

The High Court had rejected the bar body's plea seeking a ban on use of pellet guns on the ground that the Centre had already set up a Committee of Experts through its memorandum of July 26, 2016 for exploring alternatives to pellet guns.

The top court said there were "two ways to decide the case at hand. Either the parties sit together and find a solution", or the court decides the case.

It said the Bar was a "responsible" and "respectable" body and it should help in finding a solution and fixed the plea for final hearing on October 4.

During the hearing, Solicitor General Ranjit Kumar, appearing for the Centre, referred to the plea of the Bar body in the High Court and alleged that they had even termed as "mysterious" the accession of Jammu and Kashmir to India.

"They (Bar) are questioning the accession of Jamu and Kashmir with India. They term it mysterious," he said.

He said the Bar body had come up with suggestions but they have not filed them. "The Government of India is willing to consider the suggestions".

With regard to the standard operating procedures (SOP) being followed by the security agencies in the state, the law officer said that the SOP cannot be parted with as it was confidential.

The bench asked the Bar body to file its suggestions in the meantime.

Earlier, the government had ruled out talks with separatist elements or those raising the issues of "accession or Azaadi" in the Kashmir Valley. It had said that a dialogue to restore normalcy was possible only with the legally recognised stakeholders.

The top court had asked the Bar body at Srinagar to come up with suggestions to resolve the crisis, including stonepelting and violent street protests in the Kashmir Valley.

The Centre had made it clear that politics cannot be allowed as the talks to restore normalcy in the Valley was going on at the highest level between Prime Minister and J&K Chief Minister.

"The Chief Minister is with the Prime Minister, what further dialogue is required? The Prime Minister has invited the Chief Minister. She (Mehbooba Mufti) is their CM," the then Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi had said.

The bar association is insisting that there should be a "unilateral declaration of cease-fire", withdrawal of security forces, revocation of AFSPA and stoppage of using pellet guns.

It also blamed the governments after Atal Bihari Vajpayee of not taking forward the initiatives undertaken by him to resolve the contentious issue plaguing the state.

During the hearing on April 10, the Centre had told the Supreme Court it was exploring a crowd control option that is akin to rubber bullets but not as lethal as pellet guns which were being used as a last resort to quell the violence.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp