STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Don’t owe an explanation on draft: SC on order on Jallikattu

The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a plea urging it to pass an order on Jallikattu before the harvest festival of Pongal, which begins on Saturday.

Published: 14th January 2017 04:42 AM  |   Last Updated: 14th January 2017 04:42 AM   |  A+A-

A view of the Supreme Court premises. (File/PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a plea urging it to pass an order on Jallikattu before the harvest festival of Pongal, which begins on Saturday.
The Bench refused to allow the plea from a group of lawyers, who sought pronouncement of the verdict early. “We are not here to give an explanation to anyone whether the draft is ready or not,” the Bench said.
The court had reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the Centre’s notification allowing the sport and issued a statement clarifying that the same Bench of Justices Dipak Mishra and R F Nariman will pronounce the verdict, and not Justice R Banumathi who belongs to Tamil Nadu.

The development came just a day after the AIADMK urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to immediately issue an ordinance to remove bulls from the list of animals that are banned from being exhibited or trained, so that Jallikattu could be held smoothly this year. The apex court had banned Jallikattu on grounds of cruelty towards animals in a 2014 verdict.
Environment Minister Anil Madhav Dave, who met a delegation led by Deputy Speaker of Lok Sabha M Thambidurai earlier this week on the issue, blamed the previous UPA government for including bulls in the list of animals prohibited from being exhibited or trained as performing animals.
Dave asserted that there was no ill-treatment of bulls and expressed confidence that the SC will look into all the aspects while giving its verdict.

The court had earlier questioned the Centre for its January 2016 notification allowing use of bulls in events like Jallikattu, saying its 2014 verdict banning the use of the animals cannot be negated. The Centre, however, had justified the stand saying it could ensure that the bulls were not tortured or fed with alcohol before the sport.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp