Aadhaar hearing: Privacy not absolute right, says Supreme Court

Apex Court observes it will have to be defined for it to be a fundamental right; says concerns cannot prevent State from making laws.

Published: 20th July 2017 09:38 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th July 2017 09:38 AM   |  A+A-

PTI file image of Aadhaar Card

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Privacy is not an absolute right and it needs to be defined to be recognised as a fundamental right, the nine-judge Constitution Bench of Supreme Court observed. The court added that concerns over privacy cannot prevent the State from making laws imposing reasonable restrictions. The bench’s final verdict could be crucial for petitions challenging government’s mandatory Aadhaar scheme.

Appearing on behalf of petitioners, senior advocate Gopal Subramaniam challenged the Aadhaar scheme arguing ‘privacy need not be carved out’. “It’s embedded in right to liberty and dignity,” he said. This prompted Justice D Y Chandrachud to question Subramaniam. “How do we define privacy? Privacy may be a small component of liberty. But if people put themselves in the public domain using technology, is this not a surrender of their right to privacy?”

The bench further observed that right to privacy is only a small sub-sect of liberty. “Right to privacy cannot pre-empt State action. The right cannot be so overarching that it will prevent the State from legislating.” Justice Chandrachud said it will be extraordinarily dangerous to give a catalogue of what constitutes privacy. “Sexual orientation is also about privacy. If we say there is a fundamental right to privacy, our judgment in Naz Foundation becomes vulnerable.”

The bench meant its judgement against homosexuality might get reopened if privacy was assigned the status of fundamental right. In 2013, the apex court in Naz Foundation case ruled that Section 377 will continue making gay sex irrespective of age and consent an offence.

Senior advocate Shyam Divan also argued at length that a person should have the right to informational self- determination. “If you don’t recognize a right of privacy, all other rights will be denuded of their respect, vigour and essence. My body belongs to me, invasions of my bodily integrity can only be allowed under a totalitarian regime,” Divan said.

Senior advocate Arvind Datar said, “In 2017, for a democratic country like India to say that fundamental rights include a plethora of rights but not Right to Privacy would be paradoxical.” The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue Thursday with Centre likely to present its stand.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp