Uttar Pradesh govt refuses sanction to prosecute CM Yogi Adityanath in 2007 Gorakhpur riots case

An affidavit stating that sanction has been "refused" for prosecuting Adityanath in the case related to the 2007 riots was filed before the court by Chief Secretary Rahul Bhatnagar.

Published: 11th May 2017 06:35 PM  |   Last Updated: 12th May 2017 01:32 AM   |  A+A-

Yogi Adityanath (PTI)

Express News Service

ALLAHABAD: The Uttar Pradesh government on Thursday informed the Allahabad High Court through an affidavit that it would not grant sanction to prosecute Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath in the Gorakhpur communal riot case of 2007.

The riots were sparked allegedly after a provocative speech by Adityanath, the then local MP, over the killing of a Hindu youth in clashes between Hindu and Muslim groups during a Moharram procession.

The BJP MP was arrested and remained in jail for 10 days before getting bail from a court.

UP Chief Secretary Rahul Bhatnagar, who appeared in the court following the directions of the High Court, filed the affidavit stating the State’s principal secretary (home) refused on May 3 to grant sanction to prosecute the accused in the communal riot case of 2007.

The affidavit further stated the decision of the principal secretary is based on the opinion of law department, forensic report and other evidences collected by the investigating officer (IO) while the CB-CID had filed the final report before the trial court in connection with the case.

Advocate General Raghvendra Singh, who appeared before the court on behalf of the State government, argued that the case was politically motivated and was registered by the petitioners after a delay of almost 10 months after the incident occured.

The development came during hearing of a petition seeking an independent probe into the violence.

The petition was filed by Parvez Parwaz, the complainant in the FIR lodged at Cantonment police station of Gorakhpur in connection with the riots and Asad Hayat, a witness in the case. The petitioners moved the high court seeking an investigation into the case by an independent agency.

In response to advocate general’s submission, petitioners’ counsel SFA Naqvi requested the High Court to grant time for filing an amendment application in order to challenge the government decision. Naqvi based his argument on the premise that an accused cannot be a judge for his own cause. He contended that the order was passed by the principal secretary (home) who is working under the chief minister, an accused in the case.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp