Rohingya crisis: Strike balance between humanity and national security

The Supreme Court observed that the State has to strike balance between national security, economic concerns and humanitarian considerations.
After the communal violence increased in Myanmar, many Rohingya Muslims who left the country have shifted to Balapur in Ranga Reddy district, Telangana | R Satish Babu
After the communal violence increased in Myanmar, many Rohingya Muslims who left the country have shifted to Balapur in Ranga Reddy district, Telangana | R Satish Babu

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court said on Friday the Rohingya refugee problem was “of big magnitude”, requiring the State to play a “big role” in striking a balance between national security, economic concerns and humanitarian considerations.

The court scheduled a “holistic hearing” on the question of deporting Rohingya Muslims to Myanmar for November 21, refraining from passing any interim order staying deportation. However, it indicated that the Ce­ntre should not deport the refugees “now”.“There has to be a broader humanitarian spectrum but national interest cannot be secondary too. The question is how to strike a balance. It is an issue of big magnitude and the state has a big role. The state will have to adopt a multi-pronged approach,” the bench, headed by CJI Dipak Misra, said.

The court also observed that neither a constitutional court nor the go­vernment could remain oblivious to the plight of innocent childr­en, women, the old and the in­firm. The Centre, represented by Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, said it understood the value of the court’s observation but it was also bound by its international obligations.  

The bench, hearing a petition against blanket deportation of the Rohingyas, replied: “We will say that in our order. Take actions whenever you find anything wrong with individuals but don’t deport everyone.”

ASG Mehta said the government was conscious of its obligations and that any interim order would have huge ramifications. “We understand our responsibility very well, especially in such cases of international ramifications,” he said. The court then concluded the hearing saying the petitioner could approach the court in case any contingency arose.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com