STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Bombay High Court seeks Centre's reply on pleas of Shakti Mills rape convicts

On April 5, 2014, the three petitioners were convicted under the Section 376 (E) and sentenced to death for raping a city-based photo-journalist, as they were found to have raped another woman earlier

Published: 03rd April 2018 07:35 PM  |   Last Updated: 03rd April 2018 07:35 PM   |  A+A-

Bombay High Court (File | PTI)

By PTI

MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court today gave the Union government time till April 24 to file a reply on petitions filed by three convicts in the Shakti Mills gang-rape case challenging the constitutional validity of the law under which they were sentenced to death for a repeat offence.

A bench of Justices R M Savant and Sarang Kotwal directed the Centre to file affidavits, explaining the amended provision of the Indian Penal Code which prescribes life sentence or the capital punishment for repeat offenders in rape cases.

Three of the five persons who were convicted by the sessions court here in 2014 -- Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali and Salim Ansari -- have moved the high court.

Bengali and Ansari challenged the sessions court order allowing the prosecution to invoke Section 376 (E) of the IPC when the trial was underway.

They also challenged the constitutional validity of this section, brought in by the Union government after the infamous 2012 Delhi gang-rape case.

Jadhav filed a petition this year through senior advocate Yug Chowdhary on similar grounds.

The Union government's lawyer, advocate Sandesh Patil, told the court today that draft affidavits-in-reply on petitions of Bengali and Ansari were ready but awaiting nod of the law ministry.

As to Jadhav, advocate Patil sought more time, saying the convict had not served him a copy of the petition.

The court then gave the government time till April 24.

On April 5, 2014, the three petitioners were convicted under the Section 376 (E) and sentenced to death for raping a city-based photo-journalist, as they were found to have raped another woman earlier.

Siraj Khan, another convict, was sentenced to life imprisonment as he wasn't involved in the earlier rape, while a fifth accused, a minor, was sent to a correctional facility.

The petitioners contended that the sessions court acted beyond its power in awarding them the death sentence. They also challenged IPC Section 376 (E).

While death punishment is given only in "rarest of rare" cases, the constitutional validity of the criminal law amendment which effectively treats more than one offence of rape as "rarest of rare" should be examined, they said.

The photo-journalist, who had gone to the defunct Shakti Mills on an assignment with a male colleague, was gang-raped by the accused on August 22, 2013, sending shock waves through the city.

The prosecution invoked Section 376 (E) when it was found that four of them had raped an 18-year-old telephone operator in the same place some months earlier.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp