STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Rajya Sabha head Venkaiah Naidu took decision without consulting three-member panel

Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu on Monday rejected the impeachment motion against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra without referring the matter to a committee, but presiding officers in

Published: 24th April 2018 03:50 AM  |   Last Updated: 24th April 2018 03:53 AM   |  A+A-

Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu (File | PTI)

Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  Vice President M Venkaiah Naidu on Monday rejected the impeachment motion against Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra without referring the matter to a committee, but presiding officers in the past, have always referred the matter to a three-member committee to examine the charges levelled against the judicial officer concerned.

In 1993, India saw the first-ever impeachment motion against Justice V Ramaswami who retired as a Supreme Court judge in 1994. Accepting the motion, speaker Rabi Ray constituted a committee comprising Justice P B Sawant of the Supreme Court, chief justice P D Desai of the Bombay High Court and Justice O Chinnappa Reddy, retired judge of the Supreme Court to investigate the affair. The committee found Ramaswami guilty of 11 out of 14 charges.

The impeachment motion was placed in the Lok Sabha for debate and voting on May 10, 1993. But the motion failed as it collapsed on the floor of the Lok Sabha following abstentions by the Congress.As per the provisions of the Judges Inquiry Act of 1968, if the motion is admitted, the speaker of Lok Sabha or the Rajya Sabha chairman constitutes an investigation committee consisting of three members. 

In January 2010, an impeachment motion was moved against Karnataka High Court chief justice P D Dinakaran by Opposition parties. Allegations listed in the impeachment motion included possessing wealth disproportionate to his known sources of income, unlawfully securing five housing board plots in the name of his wife and two daughters, entering into benami transactions and possessing land beyond the agricultural ceiling limit.

Dipak Misra, CJI

Dinakaran was then transferred to Sikkim, where he took charge as chief justice of the Sikkim High Court. Dinakaran eventually stepped down from his post in July 2011, before impeachment proceedings could be initiated against him.The then Rajya Sabha chairman Hamid Ansari had constituted the three-member panel comprising Supreme Court Justice Aftab Alam, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice J S Khehar and senior advocate P P Rao to examine the 12 charges framed in the notice of motion. But before the proceedings got completed, Dinakaran resigned from his post.

Soumitra Sen, another Calcutta High Court judge sent a letter tendering his resignation to President Pratibha Patil and the Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar just days before the Lok Sabha was preparing to take up an impeachment motion that had been passed by a large majority in the Upper House on August 18.Probe panel was set up by Rajya Sabha chairman Hamid Ansari headed by Supreme Court Justice B Sudershan Reddy and had as its members Punjab and Haryana High Court Chief Justice Mukul Mudgal and noted Jurist Fali S. Nariman. The committee said the charges were duly proved.

Sen was found guilty of misappropriating lakhs of rupees when he was a lawyer in the 1980s and had been appointed received by the Calcutta High Court and of misrepresenting facts.In April 2015, a three member judicial committee was set up by vice president Hamid Ansari comprising Supreme Court judge R Bhanumathi, Justice Manjula Chellur and senior advocate K K Venugopal after admitting a motion supported by 58 members to impeach Justice S K Gangele, of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on charges of sexual harassment against him by a former Additional District and Sessions Judge. However, the committee gave him clean chit.



Comments(1)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Saumya

    This is an extremely ill researched article that could be taken as an unnecessary attempt at creating confusion so far as the implementation of the provisions of The Judges Enquiry Act
    3 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp