Stigma against LGBTQ will go once criminality of Section 377 leaves: Supreme Court

A five-judge constitution bench is currently hearing petitions seeking decriminalisation of 158-year-old colonial law under Section 377 of the IPC.

Published: 12th July 2018 02:35 PM  |   Last Updated: 13th July 2018 06:21 AM   |  A+A-


Parade-goers marched on the street with rainbow flags and placards, with messages in support of the LGBTQ community. (Photo| R Satish Babu/EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Giving ample indications of how it intends to deal with the controversial section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, the Supreme Court on Thursday said the discrimination and social stigma faced by LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) community will go if the criminality attached to gay sex is done away with.

READ | Section 377 hearing: Who are the main petitioners?

A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra observed, “An environment has been created in the Indian society over the years that has led to deep-rooted discrimination against the community involved in a consensual relationship and this has impacted their mental health also. Stigma is felt because of criminality attached with it.”

The court was hearing a clutch of petitions seeking decriminalisation of section 377.

Justice Indu Malhotra said, “Homosexuality is not an aberration, but a variation. It’s an issue of right to life, of an individual because this community feels inhibited. There’s fear they won’t be protected by hospital because they might not follow the confidentiality code.”

Section 377, senior advocate Shyam Divan said, “silences a core part of one’s identity. This makes them feel they are second-class citizens in their country.”

Citing the Mental Healthcare Act, Justice D Y Chandrachud said, it does not discriminate “over sexual orientation and this indicates Parliament has recognised it”.

The observations came when senior advocate C U Singh said mere striking down of section 377 would not serve the purpose as the LGBTQ community is being discriminated against on various counts.

The Centre, however, tried to cap the ambit of the ruling, saying the court should not enter into matters of religious beliefs while deciding on section 377.

Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the court should confine its discussion to the constitutionality and legality of it alone.

Suresh Kumar Koushal, the petitioner whose appeal had led to re-criminalisation of section 377, argued against striking down or diluting the penal provision.

Manoj George, a lawyer appearing for two Christian associations, also resisted striking down section 377, and alleged that the Central government had taken a U-turn.

Constitution morality, not morality of  the majority

The SC rejected a demand for a referendum over section 377, saying it would not go by majority opinion but by constitutional morality. “We do not decide constitutional issues by conducting a referendum. We follow the concept of constitutional morality and not majority morality. We don’t go by majority morality but by constitutional morality,”  the bench said


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp