STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Adultery verdict: A progressive judgment on Section 497

This judgement becomes even more contextually relevant since it is a continuum of the recent judgment on Section 377 and reaffirms the principles of equality and justice.

Published: 28th September 2018 09:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th September 2018 09:54 AM   |  A+A-

Lawyers Kaleeswaram Raj and Thulasi K Raj leave after the Supreme Court verdict on adultery law in New Delhi Thursday September 27 2018.( Photo | Parveen Negi/ EPS)

Express News Service

Finally, the Victorian era seems to be coming to an end – the judgment on Section 497 is progressive in many ways. In the context of changing social realities of our times, especially the transforming gender equations, Justice Chandrachud’s lucid observations make a mark. He has cited the violation of Articles 14 and 21, saying that Section 497 perpetuates the subordinate status of women, denies them dignity and sexual autonomy, and is based on gender stereotypes.

I’ve always had issues with the term adultery, and Section 497 has been problematic for its patriarchal rootedness and moralistic overtones. CJI Misra’s words resonate this very thought: “It is typically an archaic provision”. He further says, “While it appears to be pro-women by protecting them against prosecution, it actually is anti-women as it treats them as husband’s chattel. Where did they get this concept of the husband for a woman to have intercourse with another married man?”

Justice Indu Malhotra asked if ‘Adultery could be treated as a crime, it could be a moral wrong towards spouse and family’. This is a historic moment, where the judges have decriminalised adultery and upheld the Constitution.

This judgement becomes even more contextually relevant since it is a continuum of the recent judgment on Section 377 and reaffirms the principles of equality and justice.

There is also a need to look afresh at the institution of marriage, especially from the perspective of women, who are not merely looking for economic and social security or acceptance, but partnerships. There is a small percentage of educated, economically independent women who are also seeking equality within marriage.   

The historicity of this judgement will have positive ramifications and pave the way for a gender-equal and just society..

Jyoti Seth
Women’s rights activist and professor of sociology at PG Government College for Women, Chandigarh

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp