INX Media case: ED wants to humiliate me, says P Chidambaram 

Interim protection from arrest extended till today; says PMLA can’t be applied retrospectively

Published: 28th August 2019 08:07 AM  |   Last Updated: 28th August 2019 08:12 AM   |  A+A-

P Chidambaram

Former Union Minister P Chidambaram (File Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Tuesday extended till Wednesday the protection from arrest by the Enforcement Directorate, granted to former finance minister P Chidambaram. 

During the hearing on Tuesday, senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Abhishek Manu Singhvi told the bench that provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) cannot be applied retrospectively against Chidambaram. The offences with which he has been charged were included in the Act only in June 2009 whereas the alleged offence dates back to May 2007, Singhvi argued. “You (the prosecution) are trying to paint a person as a kingpin when it was not even an offence,” Singhvi told a bench headed by Justice R Banumathi.

ALSO READ | P Chidambaram's family alleges harassment by media

Chidambaram has also filed a fresh application in the court seeking transcript of ED’s questioning session with him which, his counsels claimed, was evidence that he was not being evasive.

On this, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta interjected and said, “The ED wants his custodial interrogation and not confession. So we don’t need to go to Magna Carta to argue this case.” 

Singhvi responded by saying the former finance minister was not being evasive; he had fully co-operated in the probe and had answered all the questions put to him. Singhvi said 12 questions were put to Chidambaram and though six of them were repetitive, he answered all of them and never said “to hell with you and I would not answer your questions”. Chidambaram, he added, was “not obliged to give the answers that the agencies want to hear”. 

ALSO READ | P Chidambaram denies ED's allegations, says every asset disclosed by him

Mehta said he would respond to Chidambaram’s plea seeking production of transcripts of his questioning on December 19 last year and January 1 and January 21 this year during his arguments Wednesday.
Singhvi said the ED’s only purpose was to humiliate the former minister.  On the allegations of tampering with evidence, the counsel said, “Chidambaram was in power since 2014. If he wanted to, he would have tempered then.”

During the arguments, Sibal said ED cannot place documents in the court randomly and “behind the back” for seeking Chidambaram’s custody. The hearing remained inconclusive and will continue on Wednesday.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp