Jharkhand jolt to BJP, fifth to bolt in a year despite massive Lok Sabha victory

The only state where the BJP could form government again was in Haryana, that too after stitching together a post-poll alliance with the Jannayak Janta Party.
Jharkhand Mukti Morcha JMM working president Hemant Soren addresses a press conference as JMM and Congress alliance lead in the Jharkhand Assembly election results in Ranchi Monday Dec. 23 2019. (Photo | PTI)
Jharkhand Mukti Morcha JMM working president Hemant Soren addresses a press conference as JMM and Congress alliance lead in the Jharkhand Assembly election results in Ranchi Monday Dec. 23 2019. (Photo | PTI)

RANCHI: A groundswell of distrust in the leadership of Chief Minister Raghubar Das, alienation of the Sudesh Mahto-led All-Jharkhand Students Union (AJSU) and attempts to alter the twin tenancy Acts which shape tribal land rights seem to have brought about the downfall of the BJP and the victory of the JMM-Congress-RJD alliance in Jharkhand.

This is the fifth state in which opposition parties have managed to upstage and unseat the saffron party in the past one year, starting with Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh to Maharashtra recently.

The only state where the BJP could form government again was in Haryana, that too after stitching together a post-poll alliance with the Jannayak Janta Party.

Das conceded defeat as the Opposition Mahagathbandhan won 47 seats while the BJP was reduced to 25 from 37 in 2014.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi congratulated JMM leader Hemant Soren, tweeting: “Congratulations to @HemantSorenJMM ji and the JMM-led alliance for the victory in the Jharkhand polls. Best wishes to them in serving the state.”

Tribal consolidation

Perhaps the biggest reason for the BJP’s defeat was the alienation of the tribals, who constitute 36 per cent of the state’s population. In 2017, the Raghubar Das government agreed to provide land to Adanis to set up a power plant in Koderma a tribal-backward caste dominated district.

This was met with strong resistance from locals, leading to police firing and widespread outrage.

Subsequently, his government sought to amend the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act and the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act, which had been vogue since the British era.

The twin Acts protected the rights of the tribals wherein non-tribals could not acquire land.

Das tried to attract big-ticket industries in tribal-dominated areas by amending the Acts.

The amendments were dropped in the face of Opposition fury and protests even by BJP legislators. But the Mahagathbandhan skilfully exploited the fears of tribals.

“Local issues have been troubling the people here for the last several years, they cannot be fooled by talking about Ram Mandir and Article 370. The locals were angry at the handing over of tribal land to corporate houses by making changes in the Land Acquisition Act,” JMM general secretary Supriyo Bhattacharya said.

AJSU factor
The breaking of the alliance with the All-Jharkhand Students’ Union also proved to be a miscalculation. The AJSU, dominated by the powerful Mahto caste, provided the bulwark for the BJP among OBCs.

The shearing of their votes impacted both the parties, with the BJP’s vote share coming down from 50.96% in the Lok Sabha polls in May, to 33%.

The BJP won 25 seats, down from 37 in 2014. The AJSU’s vote share fell to 8% and it managed to win only two seats, down from five the last time.

The combined Mahagathbandhan vote share in the Assembly polls this time is about 36%.

BJP insiders also blamed the ‘Maharashtra syndrome’ for the distrust in AJSU.

They said after the Sena allegedly backstabbed the saffron party and denied it a chance at regaining power in Maharashtra, the BJP was wary of AJSU’s intentions.

In the run-up to the elections, the AJSU had demanded 17 seats but the BJP was ready to offer only nine to 11.

BJP leaders admitted that the Ayodhya verdict and the passage of the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act would lead to a consolidation of the Hindu votes, driving the party to treat the AJSU shabbily.

Candidates and issues

To add to the immense local anger was the “improper candidate selection” and the CM’s “complete disconnect with party workers.”

The unpopularity of the Chief Minister is reflected in the fact that he lost from East Jamshedpur to his bête noire and detractor, Saryu Roy, a former Civil Supplies Minister.

Roy often spoke out against his own government’s acts of omission and commission, which Das did not like.

“Denying a ticket to Saryu Roy harmed the BJP. Moreover, the overconfidence of senior leaders, including Das, played a major role in its debacle,” said political expert Avinash Kumar.

The strategy chalked out by senior leaders failed as they could not mobilize their workers on the ground, he added.

“Projecting Das as chief ministerial candidate backfired as he is not liked by most of the people and the BJP workers,” Kumar said.

The BJP also seemed to precedence to national issues rather than local ones.

“The opposition focused its campaigns on weak social indices, lack of connectivity, soaring unemployment, forced migration and infrastructure shortfall while the BJP’s main plank was triple talaq, Ram temple, abrogation of Article 370, CAA and NRC, among others,” said Bhattacharya.

Hemant Soren to be CM

JMM leader Hemant Soren, the son of Jharkhand architect Shibu Soren, is set to take up the reins of the state for a second term

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com