Three Bengal Maoists acquitted after spending 14 years in jail under sedition charges

The Calcutta High Court found the three accused not guilty of sedition and other charges on which they were convicted in 2005.

Published: 21st June 2019 06:36 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st June 2019 06:36 PM   |  A+A-

maoist, maoist surrender,gun

For representational purposes


KOLKATA: The Calcutta High Court Friday acquitted three alleged Maoist activists, 14 years after they were sentenced to life imprisonment by a trial court on sedition charges.

One of the three died during pendency of their appeal which was filed in 2006.

A division bench comprising Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Suvra Ghosh declared the three persons not guilty of sedition and other charges on which they were convicted.

Sushil Roy, Patitpaban Haldar and Santosh Debnath were arrested from Jhargram in the then Maoist-affected Jangalmahal area of West Bengal in 2005 on the charge that they were inciting people to hold armed struggle to overthrow the elected government in the state, their lawyer Amartya Ghosh said.

Though Maoist literature and some other materials were recovered from them, no arms were seized, he said.

The petitioners' lawyer submitted before the division bench that they were falsely implicated on sedition charges and the Arms Act by the police who claimed to have seized gelatin sticks and ammunition for 303 rifles from a rented apartment in Hooghly district.

The sessions court in Jhargram found them guilty of sedition charges and under Arms Act and sentenced them to life imprisonment in 2005.

The three persons filed an appeal before the high court in 2006.

Sushil Roy died during pendency of the appeal in 2014, Ghosh said.

The division bench found glitches in the claims of the prosecution over seizure of arms and ammunition from the apartment which the accused persons had allegedly rented in Hooghly.

Submitting that police had made false claims about seizure of arms or ammunition from them, the petitioners' lawyer told the bench that there was no signature of the accused persons in the tenancy agreement for the said accommodation.

Additional public prosecutor N Ahmed opposed the appeal of the three claiming that they were hardcore Maoists involved in seditious activities.

Hearing both the parties, the division bench acquitted the three persons.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp