PM Modi's caricature features on Time magazine cover with controversial headline

The article "Can the World's Largest Democracy Endure Another Five Years of a Modi Government?" recalls the Gujarat riots that allegedly claimed lives of scores of people.

Published: 10th May 2019 10:13 AM  |   Last Updated: 10th May 2019 06:56 PM   |  A+A-

Time has featured Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the cover page of its May 20 issue (Photo | Twitter @TIME)


NEW DELHI: American news magazine Time has featured Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the cover of its May 20 international edition with a headline that may create controversy across India amid the election season.

The headline in the cover reads "India's Divider in Chief" and carries a portrait of the Prime Minister. A secondary headline on the cover reads "Modi the Reformer." 

The title "India's Divider in Chief" pertains to the cover story in the magazine, written by Aatish Taseer, with the headline "Can the World's Largest Democracy Endure Another Five Years of a Modi Government?" 

The write up compares former Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's idea of secularism with the prevailing social "stress" under Modi, who "demonstrated no desire to foster brotherly feelings between Hindus and Muslims," as per the article.

Besides, the article also recalls the 2002 Gujarat riots that claimed many lives. 

The entire article is based on Hindu-Muslim relations and blames Modi for being pro-Hindu.

This is not the first time that Time has come out with critical commentary about Modi. In an article published in 2012, the magazine had described Modi as a controversial, ambitious and a shrewd politician.

The article written by Aatish Taseer also criticises the Congress, saying that it has little to offer other than dynastic politics, and termed Modi "lucky" as the opposition is "weak".

"Modi has won -- and may yet win again -- but to what end? His brand of populism has certainly served as a convincing critique of Indian society, of which there could be no better symbol than the Congress Party. They have little to offer other than the dynastic principle, yet another member of the Nehru-Gandhi family. 

"India's oldest party has no more political imagination than to send Priyanka Gandhi -- Rahul's sister -- to join her brother's side. It would be the equivalent of the Democrat's fielding Hillary Clinton again in 2020, with the added enticement of Chelsea as VP," the article read.

"Modi is lucky to be blessed with so weak an opposition -- a ragtag coalition of parties, led by the Congress, with no agenda other than to defeat him," it added. 

Reacting to the article, the Congress said that it was not surprised as under Modi's reign, India has seen ugly instances of mob lynching against the minorities, while there has been a conspicuous silence from his party, the BJP.

"Modi in 2019 has brazenly flouted his Hindutva mission. In an unprecedented polarising speech, he talked of a Hindu minority seat in Wayanad from where Rahul Gandhi is contesting the elections. 

"By fielding Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur as the BJP candidate from Bhopal, Modi was sending out a clear message that he was backing the RSS agenda of a Hindu Rashtra," Congress spokesperson Sanjay Jha told IANS.

He further said that Modi took the entire country for a ride under the subterfuge of development and this time he has bared his communal fangs and let loose a poisonous overflow in our secular society.

The All India Mahila Congress tweeted: "Sitting PM makes it to the cover of TIME Magazine and the title is 'Divider In Chief'. Of the great democracies to fall to populism, India was the first, says the opening sentence of the article. Your truth is for all to see @narendramodi."


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • RC

    Should we ask for a better instance of Western interference in the autonomy of other countries trying to influence voters their voters. Colonial DNA is still alive. Another instance of abuse by the free press. Will you exercise your freedoms in the next Middle East elections.
    2 years ago reply
  • swa

    One only talks about the Lion in its elements. Freedom of expression is abused
    2 years ago reply
  • Kohli

    No matter what anyone may say
    2 years ago reply

    Time stand still for Times. When the supreme court has cleared Modiji
    2 years ago reply
  • Dugaprasad mk

    This magazine may a reputed one but is biased in reporting at the behest of Christian and ISIS propaganda machinery
    2 years ago reply
  • Satheesan

    Western powers don't want powerful leader as PM of India. They want only Weak and puppet as PM.
    2 years ago reply
  • Virag Pachpore

    TIME magazine's story in not in a good taste and it violated the journalistic norms. TIME magazine does not enjoy the rights to defame our Prime Minister as "Divider in Chief". Every proud Indian must refute this and denounce the TIME journalism.
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp