Supreme Court hears tribal eviction case, no defence from Centre 

States given four weeks to provide data. The case is adjourned to November 26 for final arguments.

Published: 12th September 2019 11:50 PM  |   Last Updated: 12th September 2019 11:50 PM   |  A+A-

Tribals

Image of tribals used for representational purpose only

By Express News Service

Though a million traditional forest dwellers are living in fear of eviction, Central government on Thursday has failed to turn up before the Supreme Court to defend the Forest Rights Act (FRA), when the case has come up for hearing. 

The apex court asked where the Central government was and was told the Solicitor General was not present. The court then heard the matter, allowed all the requests for impleadment by a large number of organisations defending the Forest Rights Act, and also allowed the petitioners’ request to make the Forest Survey of India a party.

The court also said its order putting evictions of rejected claimants on hold will continue, and the matter will now next be heard on November 26 for final arguments.  

It has granted four weeks time to the state governments and to other parties to supply data and to reply. CR Bijoy, environmentalist and tribal activist from Coimbatore, told Express that the court issued notice on the recent applications of the petitioners (NGOs and retired forest officials) to stop state governments from reviewing rejections of claims under the law, and to direct the Central government to release funds for the Forest Survey of India to conduct its survey using money from compensatory afforestation funds. 

The Court clarified that its “interim orders will continue” and asked Forest Survey of India’s survey of forest ‘encroachment’, using data from States, to continue, based on the petitioners’ claim that satellite imagery can be used to verify claims under the Act.

However, sources in the Tamil Nadu tribal welfare department told Express that it was yet to send the shapefiles of geo-referenced boundaries of those land parcels on which claims of STs and other traditional forest dwellers have been rejected.  

In June, at a review meeting at Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Tamil Nadu government had accepted that it rejected 10,656 claims filed by STs and other traditional forest dwellers without following due procedure. However, the government said review process was under progress. 

Jaideep Singh Kochher, Economic Adviser, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, said the States have to follow the procedure as laid down in the FRA Act.

"The states should make their position clear regarding the number of claimants whose claims have been approved and other whose claims are finally rejected." 

Official statistics show that Tamil Nadu has received the lowest number of claims among bigger States and was equally poor in granting titles.

Tamil Nadu has distributed 6,387 titles and the extent of forest land for which titles distributed is 8,607.26 acres.

In contrast, Chattisgarh has received 8,87,665 claims, distributed 4,16,359 titles and the extent of forest land for which titles distributed was 26.73 lakh acres.

Even a smaller state like Kerala is doing better with 24,599 titles been distributed.

Other southern states like Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have been implementing the FRA to larger extent. Tamil Nadu has 33 per cent rejection rate.   

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)

Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp