Prashant Bhushan expresses regret, but only for ‘no helmet’ tweet on CJI SA Bobde

A bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra had earlier issued a contempt notice to Bhushan in a suo moto case following a petition requesting the same over two of his tweets.

Published: 03rd August 2020 02:03 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th August 2020 10:43 AM   |  A+A-

Noted lawyer Prashant Bhushan

Noted lawyer Prashant Bhushan (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Days after contempt notice was issued to Prashant Bhushan for two of his tweets the senior advocate on Monday expressed regret only for a portion of his tweet on Chief Justice of India S A Bobde and former CJIs.

In his 142-page affidavit filed through lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, Bhushan has regretted only one thing that he did not notice the motorcycle was on a stand when he tweeted on Bobde riding a Rs 50 lakh bike “without a helmet”.

“At the outset, I admit that I did not notice that the bike was on a stand and therefore wearing a helmet was not required. I, therefore, regret that part of my tweet. However, I stand by the remaining part of what I have stated in my tweet,” the affidavit reads.

ALSO READ: Contempt notice - More Supreme Court judges back advocate Prashant Bhushan

“The respondent states that expression of his opinion however outspoken, disagreeable or however unpalatable to some, cannot constitute contempt of court. This proposition has been laid down by several judgments of the Supreme Court and in foreign jurisdictions such as Britain, USA and Canada,” he submitted.

He also referred to the freedom of speech and expression under Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution, and said this right was the ultimate guardian of all the values that the Constitution holds sacred.

“The relationship between Article l9 (1A) and Article 129 (this gives power of contempt to SC) is governed by Article 19(2). Article l9 (2) (reasonable restrictions) recognizes the fetters that can be placed on 
freedom of speech & expression under the court’s power to punish for contempt under Article 129.

About his other tweets, however, Bhushan said they were his “bonafide impression about the manner and functioning of the Supreme Court in the past years”. 


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • anthony

    It would be nice if the Supreme Court reestablishes its credibility after the sad spectacle of four Judges addressing a Press conference to warn the country that Democracy is in danger in our country. Events after this press conference has further led to the speculation about the independence of the Judiciary.
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp