Supreme Court upholds validity of SC/ST Act amendments

No prior approval of appointing authority or a senior police officer is required before registration of an FIR. 

Published: 11th February 2020 09:54 AM  |   Last Updated: 11th February 2020 09:54 AM   |  A+A-


For representational purposes

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  The Supreme Court on Monday upheld the constitutional validity of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2018 that restored the provision denying anticipatory bail to a person booked under the law.

Parliament had, by an amendment to the SC/ST Act, introduced Section 18A in 2018 whereby a preliminary inquiry is no longer a must when a complaint under this law is made. Also, no prior approval of appointing authority or a senior police officer is required before registration of an FIR. 

The Supreme Court had in a judgment on March 20, 2018, mandated preliminary inquiry and clearing of the appointing authority before arrest of a person under the stringent SC/ST Act. The ruling had sparked protests by Dalits across the country.

Delivering the verdict on Monday, a bench of Justices Arun Mishra, Vineet Saran and S Ravindra Bhatt directed that provisions related to anticipatory bail be exercised sparingly and in exceptional cases where no prima facie case is made out.

Justice Bhat penned down a separate order concurring with Justice Mishra and added a caveat that pre-arrest bail should be granted only in extraordinary situations where a denial of bail would mean miscarriage of justice.

“It is important to reiterate and emphasize that unless provisions of the Act are enforced in their true letter and spirit, with utmost earnestness and dispatch, the dream and ideal of a casteless society will remain only a dream, a mirage.

The marginalisation of SC and ST communities is an enduring exclusion and is based almost solely on caste identities,” he said.In its September 30 verdict, the three-judge bench recalled the March 2018 order that had diluted the stringent provisions of the SC/ST Act and restored automatic arrest under this law. 

I consider such stringent terms, otherwise contrary to the philosophy of bail, absolutely essential, because a liberal use of the power to grant pre-arrest bail would defeat the intention of Parliament Justice S Ravindra Bhat

Protests forced a review

Violent protests took place across India claiming several lives after SC’s March 2018 verdict. Parliament on August 9 last year passed the Bill to overturn the SC judgment.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now
(Get the news that matters from New Indian Express on WhatsApp. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow the instructions after that.)


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp