What purpose served by disclosing names of COVID-19 patients, asks Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court asked what purpose would be served by disclosing the names of COVID-19 patients.

Published: 28th July 2020 01:27 PM  |   Last Updated: 28th July 2020 01:27 PM   |  A+A-

Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court (Photo | PTI)


MUMBAI: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday said if a person takes all necessary precautions, then he or she need not worry about contracting COVID-19, and asked what purpose would be served by disclosing the names of persons who tested positive for the disease.

A division bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Sarang Kotwal was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by two persons, seeking disclosure of names of COVID-19 patients to enable contact tracing and to save others from being infected.

The PIL, filed by law student Vaishnavi Gholave and Solapur-based farmer Mahesh Gadekar, claimed the fundamental right to life and the right to lead a healthy life stand above the fundamental right to privacy in the present situation where public interest and morality are important.

The high court, however, asked what purpose would be served by disclosing the names of COVID-19 patients.

"There is always a risk of ostracisation, Chief Justice Datta pointed out.

"Everything depends on each person...if a person takes necessary precautions like avoiding congregations, washing hands, using head shields and sanitisers, then the person is at a lesser risk of being infected, he said.

The court further said when people come in contact with a person who they know has later tested positive for COVID-19, then they know that they should also get themselves tested or lookout for symptoms.

But then there are persons who are asymptomatic or are silent carriers of coronavirus.

With such persons, people tend to get a bit complacent and meet them and talk to them without masks, the court said.

Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, appearing for the Union government, told the court that there are judgments passed by high courts of Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Madras and Orissa dismissing similar pleas seeking disclosure of the names of COVID-19 patients.

The bench directed the petitioners advocate Yashodeep Deshmukh to peruse those judgments and posted the matter for further hearing next week.

Stay up to date on all the latest Nation news with The New Indian Express App. Download now


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Deena Dayalan

    Bombay HC is absolutely right. It is individual's responsibility to safeguard oneself also. By disclosing the names there is violation of personal privacy too with medical confidentiality.
    16 days ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp