STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

Hathras rape case: HC expresses concern over no action against DM so far by state government

It may be recalled that the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court had taken a suo-motu cognizance of the case, especially the issue of cremation of the victim girl.

Published: 02nd November 2020 10:47 PM  |   Last Updated: 02nd November 2020 10:52 PM   |  A+A-

Activists hold placards and shout slogans during a protest against the death of Hathras gang rape victim.

Activists hold placards and shout slogans during a protest against the death of Hathras gang rape victim. (File Photo | PTI)

Express News Service

LUCKNOW: Picking up the threads from the last hearing into Hathras rape and murder case, the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court on Monday expressed anguish over the fact that the state government was yet to take action against the district magistrate Praveen Kumar Luxkar to ensure fairness of probe and justice.

Notably, on the last hearing in the case on October 12, the court had asked the state government as to why it suspended Hathras Superintendent of Police Vikrant Vir for allegedly rushing with the cremation of the body of 19-year-old victim in the dead of night even without  the consent of the family and didn't take any action against the DM concerned when the decision of cremation was taken jointly.

Responding to the court’s query on Monday, the state government assured the double judge bench comprising Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Rajan Roy, to take decision in his regard by November 25.

Besides  the bench also directed the CBI which is probing the case, to lay the status of investigation into the matter before it on the next date.

ALSO READ | Have full faith in judiciary: Hathras gang rape victim's family welcomes court-monitored probe

It may be recalled that the Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court had taken a suo-motu cognizance of the case, especially the issue of cremation of the victim girl.

While conducting in-camera proceedings, the bench asked the state government as to what decision was taken about the DM in view of the previous direction. At this, the state defended the DM saying that he did not do any wrong.

“The SP too was suspended owing to lack of proper handling of  ‘probe’ into the alleged gang rape case and not over the cremation issue,” state government said.

At this, the bench said that on last date it had asked the state if it was just to retain the DM in Hathras for the purpose of impartiality and transparency.

Reminding previous hearing to the state government, the bench said that to that, the state had assured it to do the needful in DM’s matter to address its concern.

ALSO READ | Dalit rights team seeks psycho-social help for Hathras victim’s family

Earlier, apart from the state government, DM Pravin Kumar and the then SP Vikrant Vir filed their respective affidavits in the court. Additional Advocate general VK Sahi apprised the bench that the state’s affidavit contained a draft of the guidelines to be followed in Hathras like situation so far as cremation was concerned.

In their affidavits, both the DM and then SP repeated their stand that the decision to cremate the victim’s body  in night was taken keeping in view the situation then in bona-fide manner. They also refuted the allegations in their affidavits that kerosene was used in the cremation.

 At the time of hearing, ADG Law and Order, Prashant Kumar and home secretary Tarun Gaba, remained present in the court.

 In course of hearing, the court also asked CBI counsel Anurag Singh to furnish the status of probe by next date.

The state authorities also apprised the court that the compensation amount was transferred to the bank account of the victim’s father. It was also informed to the bench that the family was provided security by CRPF.

Senior Supreme Court lawyer Siddhartha Luthara appeared for the accused and requested the court not to make any observation in its orders that may affect the investigation.

Meanwhile, the victim’s lawyer Seema Kushwaha reiterated the demand to transfer the trial out of UP Central government’s assistant solicitor general SP Raju and amicus curie JN Mathur also appeared to address the bench.

ALSO WATCH:​



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

IPL_2020
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp