Hold Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp directly responsible for spreading hate, fake news: Plea in SC

The PIL further prayed that the government is directed to appoint an expert investigating officer in each case registered for spreading hate and fake news through social media platforms.

Published: 30th October 2020 02:22 PM  |   Last Updated: 30th October 2020 02:22 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (File Photo| Shekhar Yadav, EPS)


NEW DELHI: A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking directions to make laws to regulate social media platforms and to hold Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Instagram directly responsible for spreading hate speeches and fake news.

The public interest litigation (PIL), filed by advocate Vineet Jindal through advocate Raj Kishor Choudhary earlier this week, sought directions to the Centre to frame laws for criminal prosecution of persons involved in spreading hate and fake news through social media.

It requested the top court to direct the Central government to establish a mechanism for automatic removal of hate speeches and fake news within a short timeframe so that the counter production of such hate speeches or fake news can be minimised.

The PIL further prayed that the government is directed to appoint an expert investigating officer in each case registered for spreading hate and fake news through social media platforms.

"A registered account is sufficient to start a channel, which provides a platform of uploading videos in the social media such as Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, etc, which means anyone can float anything in the social media, there is no restriction or censor for their contents and there are no regulations at all by the government," the plea said.

The petitioner said that the plea was filed in wake of two tweets by the name of one Armin Navabi from his Twitter handle @ArminNavabi against Hindu goddess and using derogatory terms.

The petition submitted that freedom of speech and expression is broadly understood as the notion that every person has the natural right to freely express themselves through any media and frontier without outside interference, such as censorship and without fear of reprisal, such as threats and persecutions.

"However, Freedom of expression is a complex right, this is because freedom of expression is not absolute and carries with it special duties and responsibilities, therefore, it may be subject to certain restrictions provided by law," the plea said.

"Social media's reach is much wider than that of the traditional media. Freedom of speech and expression under Article 19(1) of the Constitution goes hand-in-hand with reasonable restrictions that may be imposed under Article 19(2)," it added.

The plea contended that it would be beneficial for India to look at the regulation standards implemented by different countries in order to introduce guidelines, which form a balance between freedom of speech and accountability of social media platforms.

"India has seen plenty of communal violence in the past, but in today's time of social media, these aggressions are not just restricted to the regional or local population, the entire country is taken along. The fog of rumours, innuendo, and hate that act as kindling in a local communal clash immediately spread across India through social media," the plea said.

It said there had been a few horrific communal riots and social media has been playing a harmful role in inciting communal violence in India and time has come to check its misuse.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Johanna AGA

    Freedom of Speech and Freedom of expression are absolute, except in cases where laws already exist, such not yelling "FIRE" in a crowded movie theater, because that takes away peoples right to safety, it also could potentially be life threatening, directly or indirectly. That.s why there are laws for also not pulling emergency fire alarms. Another example might be publicly calling for the assault, rape or death of someone or a group. Anything that can actually cause physical harm, is not free speech. Ideas are not protected from free speech. Ideas, like political or religious ideologies do not have feelings, do not have the right to NOT be criticized or mocked. And how dare India impose it's ideologies on what is protected from free speech and what isn't. India's laws stop at the Indian boarder. So, if you can't handle online criticism in all it's forms, then maybe your government should force ISP's to ban social media platforms, since y'all are not mature enough to handle criticism/mockery or pointing out some of the horrible things in your country because of Hinduism
    2 years ago reply
  • Uver

    Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp monitor all your data and monitor your conversations. Use the right programs for the utopia ecosystem type and then your data will be safe and your account will not be hacked
    2 years ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp