Sexual harassment plaint against police officer: ICC report submitted in HC

When the matter came up earlier on October 22, Justice C Saravanan had then ordered maintenance of status-quo in respect of the proceedings pending before the ICC.

Published: 09th December 2021 06:34 PM  |   Last Updated: 09th December 2021 06:34 PM   |  A+A-

Rape, sexual harassment

For representational purposes. (Photo | EPS)

By PTI

CHENNAI: Tamil Nadu Advocate-General R Shanmugasundaram on Thursday produced in the Madras High Court, the report of the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC), constituted to probe the alleged sexual harassment of a woman IPS officer by a suspended DGP.

The AG submitted the report in a sealed cover to Justice V Parthiban when the writ petition from the suspended Special DGP came up for further hearing today. The judge adjourned the matter till December 17.

The petition prayed the court to quash the proceedings that had been conducted so far by the ICC and order a proper inquiry after following due process of law and in accordance with the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act.

When the matter came up earlier on October 22, Justice C Saravanan had then ordered maintenance of status-quo in respect of the proceedings pending before the ICC.

He adjourned the matter by four weeks, with a direction to the State file its counter by then. Following a complaint from a woman IPS officer on February 22 this year that she was allegedly sexually harassed by the suspended officer, the ICC was formed to inquire into the allegations.

In his writ petition, the official alleged that two members of the ICC were biased against him. The committee had submitted its report to the state government on April 8 without holding enquiry in a proper and unbiased manner.

He also claimed most of the witnesses were subordinates to the complainant and they could not depose freely. Hence, he prayed for the transfer of the complainant too to some other place.

But, this request was also not considered. Based on the ICC's report, a charge-memo was issued to him on May 31. But, even a copy of the ICC's report was not furnished to him. "As such the entire proceedings are vitiated and liable to be struck down," he claimed.

Meanwhile, as directed by the court, a counter was filed on behalf of the state DGP refuting all the contentions of the accused official.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp