SC refuses to entertain plea challenging laws dealing with religious conversion

The SC bench said that the petitioner should approach the concerned high court and observed that Allahabad and Uttarakhand HCs are dealing petitions on it.

Published: 03rd February 2021 07:56 PM  |   Last Updated: 03rd February 2021 07:56 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo| Shekhar Yadav, EPS)


NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Wednesday refused to entertain a plea challenging the validity of laws enacted by states, including Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand, which deal with religious conversion by marriage and others.

A bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde, while saying that the petitioner should approach the concerned high court, observed that the issue raised is important and the high courts of Allahabad and Uttarakhand are already dealing with petitions on it.

“We are not on merits at all. Allahabad and Uttarakhand high courts are entertaining similar petitions. We are not denying the importance of matter at all. We are saying we would like to have the benefit of high courts view,” said the bench, also comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Senior advocate Sanjay Parikh, appearing for the petitioner, said they have challenged the laws enacted by three states including Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand as innocent persons are being booked under these Acts.

He said the top court had earlier issued notice on similar petitions and this plea should be tagged with them.

However, the bench said the petitioner should approach the concerned high court on this.

“Sanjay Parikh, senior counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the high court. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for,” the bench said in its order.

On January 25, the top court had refused to transfer to itself the petitions filed in the Allahabad High Court challenging the new state law.

The bench had said that it would like to have the advantage of the high court order.

Taking note of the observation by the apex court, the Uttar Pradesh government had preferred to withdraw the transfer petition.

Before that, on January 6, the apex court had agreed to examine the new laws of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand regulating religious conversions by marriage.

However, it had refused to stay the controversial provisions of the laws and had issued notices to both the state governments on two separate petitions.

Both the petitions have challenged the Constitutional validity of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020 and the Uttarakhand Freedom of Religion Act, 2018.

The Uttar Pradesh Ordinance was cleared by the state Cabinet in November last year and ascent was given by Governor Anandiben Patel on November 28, 2020.

It relates not only to inter-faith marriages but all religious conversions and lays down elaborate procedures for those who wish to convert to another religion.

The Uttarakhand Act entails two year jail term for those found guilty of religious conversion through force or “allurement”, which can be in cash or in kind -- employment or material benefit.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp