Illegal construction: Bombay HC rejects Sonu Sood's plea against BMC notice

In his petition before the High Court, Sood claimed he had not carried out any illegal construction in the building named 'Shakti Sagar.'

Published: 21st January 2021 12:42 PM  |   Last Updated: 21st January 2021 09:51 PM   |  A+A-

Bollywood actor Sonu Sood

Bollywood actor Sonu Sood (Photo| Twitter)


MUMBAI:  The Bombay High Court on Thursday dismissed a petition filed by Bollywood actor Sonu Sood seeking interim relief against an unauthorized construction notice issued to him by BMC, in Mumbai.    

A single bench of Justice Prithviraj Chavan dismissed the petition, granting no relief to the actor. Earlier, the City Civil Court had also rejected Bollywood actor petition.    

According to the Bombay High Court order, the BMC is able to take action against the illegal alternation and change of user from residential to commercial by the actor. The BMC had issued the notice in October against Sonu Sood under section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, with regard to alterations made to a six-storey residential building, in Juhu. In the notice, the BMC claimed that Sood was a "habitual offender," who was repeatedly trying to convert a residential building into a hotel.    

The actor had played the significant roles in several films like Singh is King and Dabang, however, his popularity shot to fame when he extended financial help to migrants during the nationwide lockdown announced due to the Covid pandemic. He also arranged for buses to take poor migrant workers back from cities, to their villages.

In his petition before the High Court, Sood claimed he had not carried out any illegal construction in the building named 'Shakti Sagar.'

"The petitioner (Sood) has not made any changes in the building that warrants permission from the BMC. Only those changes that are allowed under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act has been done," advocate Amogh Singh, representing Sood had argued.  

Through the petition, Sood had sought to quash the notice and to grant interim relief by not taking any 'coercive' action against him. He was granted interim relief.

While BMC represented by senior counsel Anil Sakhare stated in High court that Sood was a "habitual the offender" who wants to "enjoy the commercial proceeds of unauthorised work and therefore once again started re-constructing the demolished portion in order to make it operational as a hotel albeit illegally and without permission from the License department," the civic body said in the affidavit.    

The BMC said that the building was constructed and modified contrary to the building plan. Moreover, neither Sood nor his wife Sonali had documents indicate they are the owners of the building, the civic body said.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp