STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

India can't have parallel legal systems for rich and poor, impartial judiciary democracy's cornerstone: Supreme Court

A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said district judiciary is the first point of interface with the citizens.

Published: 22nd July 2021 03:09 PM  |   Last Updated: 22nd July 2021 03:09 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo| EPS)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: India cannot have two parallel legal systems, one for the rich and resourceful and those who wield political power and the other for "small men" without resources and capabilities to access justice, the Supreme Court said on Thursday.

The apex court also said the "colonial mindset meted out to the district judiciary" must change to preserve the faith of citizens and stated that judges are "made targets when they stand up for what is right".

The top court made these crucial observations while cancelling the bail granted to Madhya Pradesh BSP MLA's husband, who was arrested in over a two-year-old murder case of Congress leader Devendra Chourasia.

An independent and impartial judiciary is the cornerstone of democracy and it should be immune from political pressures and considerations, the top court said.

"India cannot have two parallel legal systems, one for the rich and resourceful and those who wield political power and the other for small men without resources without capabilities to gain justice. The existence of a dual system will only chip away the legitimacy of the law. The duty also falls on the state machinery to be committed to the rule of law," the top court said.

A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said district judiciary is the first point of interface with the citizens.

"If the faith of citizens in the judiciary is to be preserved, it is the district judiciary on which attention must be focused," the bench said.

The top court said trial court judges work amidst appalling conditions, lack of infrastructure, inadequate protection and there are examples of judges being made targets when they stand up for what is right.

Also, there is sadly a subservience to the administration of the high courts for transfers and postings which renders them vulnerable, the bench said.

"The colonial mindset meted out to the district judiciary must change, it is only then that civil liberties for every citizen, be it accused victim or civil society will be meaningfully preserved in our trial courts which are first line of defence for those who are being wronged," the bench said.

The apex court said the function of the judiciary as an independent institution is rooted in the concept of separation of powers. Individual judges must be able to adjudicate disputes in accordance with law unhindered by any other factors and for that reason independence of the judiciary and of each judge is a must, the bench said.

Independence of individual judges also encompasses that they are independent of their superiors and colleagues, it said adding that our constitution specially envisages Independence of district judiciary which is mentioned in Article 50.

"If District judiciary operates under the supervision of the high court then is it must secure its independence from external influence and control.

"This compartmentalisation of judiciary and executive should not be breached by the personal decision making of the judges and the conduct of court proceedings under the relevant acts," the bench said.

The top court said there is no gainsaying that judiciary should be immune to political pressures and considerations.

A judiciary susceptible to such pressures allows politicians to operate with impunity and criminality to flourish in the political apparatus of the state.

The apex court said the judges being undeterred in their commitment to follow law and do justice should be cautious of launching a diatribe against state authorities without due care and diligence.



Comments(2)

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Sankaramani

    Some of these judges may visit magistrate courts and see how it functions.My own experience in a small vechicle accident case
    11 days ago reply
  • G. Srinivasan

    Appeal system to various higher courts should be abolished and depending on the gravity of the matter, cases should be delegated to various levels and the trial court's verdict should be final.
    12 days ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp