Chances of getting re-infected with Covid minimal, suggests latest research

Based on this, researchers have concluded that the efficacy of natural infection against reinfection could be about 95.2%.

Published: 20th March 2021 03:36 AM  |   Last Updated: 20th March 2021 08:06 AM   |  A+A-

A health worker takes a nasal swab sample to test for COVID-19 at a market place in Mumbai, India, Thursday, March 18, 2021. (Photo | AP)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI:  A latest study has shown that reinfection in Covid-19 is rare and natural infection appears to elicit strong protection against reinfection with an efficacy of nearly 95 per cent for at least seven months. 

This comes a day after a research published in the Lancet said that while those with previous history of infection may be protected for a long time, protection drops dramatically for people over the age of 65.  

The study called “SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in a cohort of 43,000 antibody-positive individuals followed for up to 35 weeks” done in Qatar, which has significance for other countries too, has shown that while the incidence rate of reinfection was  0.66 per 10,000 people in those who were antibody positive, it was 2.15 per 10,000 people in those never infected before.

Based on this, researchers have concluded that the efficacy of natural infection against reinfection could be about 95.2%.

They also noted that reinfections were less severe than primary infections and only one reinfection was severe, two were moderate, while none were critical or fatal.

Most reinfections 66.7% were diagnosed through random or routine testing, or through contact tracing.

Incidentally, this study comes after another research titled “Assessment of protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 million PCR-tested individuals in Denmark in 2020: a population-level observational study” was published in The Lancet. 

This study found the protection in general population to be 80 per cent or higher in those under 65, but approximately 47 per cent in those aged 65 and older, meaning they were more likely to be infected again.

“Our estimates for overall protection after the previous infection are in line with several other cohort studies,” noted the scientists.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp