Inability to garner trust leads to failure of alliance in Assam

The hotchpotch alliance of 10 opposition parties with contrasting ideologies, which also had no chief ministerial face, found few takers eventually.

Published: 03rd May 2021 10:45 AM  |   Last Updated: 03rd May 2021 10:45 AM   |  A+A-

Congress Flag

Congress flag (Photo | PTI)

By Express News Service

GUWAHATI:  The hotchpotch alliance of 10 opposition parties with contrasting ideologies, which also had no chief ministerial face, found few takers eventually.

The “Mahajot”, formed two months ago to oust BJP, was led by Congress. It faced a leadership crisis and got riddled with factionalism following the death of former Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi.

The Congress and minority-based All India United Democratic Front (AIUDF) had come together to thwart the split of anti-BJP and anti-Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) votes. In 2016, their combined vote share was more than the winning candidates of the BJP-led alliance in 14 seats.

If the alliance paid dividends in the Bengali-majority central and lower Assam besides Barak Valley, it cost the Congress dear in the Assamese-dominated upper part of the state. In a state grappling with the problem of illegal migration from Bangladesh, voters in upper Assam were upset that Congress aligned with AIUDF, perceived to be the protector of illegal immigrants.

“The alliance with the AIUDF affected us greatly in upper Assam,” a Congress insider said. 

Of other reasons, he said Congress had a leadership vacuum after Gogoi’s death. “People did not accept the leadership of state Congress chief Ripun Bora. As we did not have a CM face, people got  confused.”

Further, the two new parties, Raijor Dal and Asom Jatiya Parishad, caused a split of the anti-BJP and anti-AGP votes in several seats, thereby affecting the Congress. Congress also overestimated or miscalculated the anti-CAA sentiments. Even as it campaigned aggressively, several leaders of the anti-CAA movement joined BJP.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

  • Chandrasekaran

    Again 50 seats is not a poor show. BJp succeeded in keeping CAA in the backburner and exploited Audf alliance to communally polarise to some extent. But the redeeming factor is the winning of 7 others which included two leaders who led the anti CAA struggle in Assam in its peak. one a muslim and another Gogoi who is incarcerated by the BJP govt. The division in the anti bjp vote got split and bjp managed to win just 5 above single majority. And a CM face nowadays has become a must. Hemant Biswa Sarma should never have been allowed to leave congress. He knows the in and outs having worked with the seasoned late Gogoi. BPF being replaced by UPPL has been a surpirse. and AGP did beyond expectations winning 10 seats in spite of betraying the assamese movement .
    1 year ago reply
flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp