Plea to restrain media too far-fetched, SC tells EC after judge's 'murder' remark makes waves

The observation by a bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud came while it was hearing the poll panel's plea challenging the Madras HC's 'murder charges' remark

Published: 03rd May 2021 12:12 PM  |   Last Updated: 03rd May 2021 02:16 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo| EPS)

By Express News Service

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday told the Election Commission that their request to stop media from reporting oral observations is too far-fetched and cannot be allowed.

The observation by a bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud came while it was hearing the poll panel's plea challenging the Madras HC's 'murder charges' remark.

The Madras High Court had slammed the Election Commission of India for allowing political rallies amid a deadly second wave of COVID-19 and had observed, “Your institution is singularly responsible for the second wave of COVID-19. Election Commission officers should be booked on murder charges probably."

During the hearing, senior advocate Rakesh Dwivedi appearing for the Election Commission sought that the media should not be allowed to report on oral observations of the court and that no criminal complaint can be filed on the basis of oral observations of the court.

At this, Justice Chandrachud said, "The discussion that takes place is as much in the public interest as the final order of the court. The discussion in court is a dialogue between the bar and the bench. Media is a very powerful watchdog in protecting the sanctity of this process."

Justice Chandrachud said, "We don’t want to demoralise the High Courts. They are important pillars in our democracy."

The court asked the Election Commission to take the Madras HC's observations in the right spirit.

Justice Chandrachud said, "To say that ECI is not subject to judicial review is not correct. To ask a judge to contain what he says in Court will not do justice to any judicial process."

At this, EC said, "Somewhere a line has to be drawn. Harsh criticism is welcome, but certain observations should not have been made."

The top court has reserved the order on the EC's plea against the Madras HC remark holding it responsible for the COVID-19 surge.

India Matters


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp