STOCK MARKET BSE NSE

SC refuses to entertain Centre's plea for transfer of petitions from HCs on interpretation of CGST Act provision

At the outset, the ASG urged for the transfer of a case from the MP HC to the top court saying around 36 similar cases are pending in several high courts.

Published: 20th September 2021 07:57 PM  |   Last Updated: 20th September 2021 07:57 PM   |  A+A-

Supreme Court

Supreme Court (Photo | EPS)

By PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Monday refused to transfer to itself the pleas pending in several high courts on interpretation of a provision of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act relating to entitlement to the credit of any input tax in respect of supply of goods or services or both.

Declining to entertain the transfer plea of the Centre, a bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana said, "Let the High Court decide the issue first. If you are aggrieved by the verdict then come to us and we will settle the law.

"Let the high courts come out with the conflicting verdicts as well, we will have the benefit of their opinions."

The bench, also comprising justices Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, requested the Madhya Pradesh High Court's Indore bench to dispose of the plea on the interpretation of section 16(2) of the CGST Act within two months.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and Additional Solicitor General (ASG) S V Raju, appearing for the Centre, urged the bench that other high courts seized of similar cases be asked not to proceed with the hearing to avoid conflicting verdicts.

The top court asked the law officers to make a mention about its order to other high courts.

At the outset, the ASG urged for the transfer of a case from the MP HC to the top court saying around 36 similar cases are pending in several high courts.

Section 16 (2) of the CGST Act says: "Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, no registered person shall be entitled to the credit of any input tax in respect of any supply of goods or services or both to him unless."

The provision stipulates the conditions when a registered person becomes entitled for credit of input tax.

The Centre wanted transfer of a plea filed by M/S Cummins Technologies India Private Ltd in the Madhya Pradesh High Court.

Recently, the top court, in a significant verdict, has held that goods and the services under the CGST law and Rules cannot be treated at par for the purposes of refund of unutilised input tax credit (ITC), saying there is "no constitutional entitlement to seek a refund" as it is governed by the statute.

It had also upheld the validity of Section 54(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Act, which deals with refund of unutilised ITC.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp