Supreme Court​ order on protected forests: Congress to go on hartal in Pathanamthitta

The Congress said this was an issue that affects people from all walks of life and the Left government was silent on it.

Published: 04th June 2022 08:52 PM  |   Last Updated: 04th June 2022 08:52 PM   |  A+A-

Congress Flag

Congress Flag (Photo | PTI)


PATHANAMTHITTA: The Congress on Saturday said it will observe hartal in six panchayats of Pathanamthitta in protest against the Supreme Court direction that each protected forest, including national parks and wildlife sanctuaries, must have an eco-sensitive zone (ESZ) of one kilometre and banning of mining activities within such parks across the nation.

The District Congress Committee has called for an hartal on June 7 in the panchayats of Aruvapalam, Thannithode, Chittar, Vadasserikkara, Perinad and Seethathodu.

Issuing a slew of directions, a bench headed by Justice L Nageswara Rao had on June 3 ordered that no permanent structure will be allowed within such ESZ and said if the local law or other rules provide for an ESZ of more than one kilometre then the earlier provision would continue to apply.

Meanwhile, state Forest Minister A K Saseendran has called for a high-level meeting on Sunday to discuss the Supreme Court order.

"We need to see how we can protect the interests of the people. We also need to see whether there is any way to safeguard the interest of the people. We will consult with the Advocate General and our counsel at the Supreme Court," Saseendran told the media.

The government is learned to have decided to inform the Supreme Court and the Union government that the apex court order was not practical in Kerala.

The Congress said this was an issue that affects people from all walks of life and the Left government was silent on it.

"We in protest against the order and the silence of the state government, have decided to observe hartal in six panchayats," a senior Congress leader in the district told the media.

Idukki MP Dean Kuriakose asked the ruling Left front to hold discussions with the Union government over the issue.

The apex court order came on a batch of applications filed in a pending PIL of 1995 and they raised two sets of issues with the first one related to mining activities in and around Jamua Ramgarh, a wildlife sanctuary in Rajasthan.

The second set of issues was related to prescribing ESZs surrounding the wildlife sanctuaries and national parks.


Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp