House demolition: Allahabad HC gives a day’s time to UP govt to respond to Parveen Fatima's plea 

The petitioners’ counsel submitted that the house demolished by the authorities did not belong to Javed Mohammad but to his wife who had received it as gift from her parents even before her marriage.

Published: 28th June 2022 09:06 PM  |   Last Updated: 28th June 2022 09:08 PM   |  A+A-

allahabad high court

Allahabad High Court (File photo| EPS)

Express News Service

LUCKNOW: The Allahabad High Court, on Tuesday, gave a day’s time to the Uttar Pradesh government and Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) to respond to a writ petition filed by the wife and daughter of Javed Mohammad alias Javed Pump, the alleged mastermind of June 10 violent protests in Prayagraj, against the demolition of their house by the district administration and Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) on June 12.

Hearing a petition filed by Parveen Fatima and Summaiya Fatima, the wife and daughter of Javed Mohammed, respectively, the division bench, comprising Justice Anjani Kumar Mishra and Justice Syed Waiz Mian, posted the matter for next hearing on June 30.

High Court lawyer KK Roy represented the petitioners while state advocate general, Ajay Kumar Mishra appeared on behalf of the state government. 

Earlier, on Monday the court had adjourned the case for a day when one of the judges had recused himself from the case.

The petitioners’ counsel submitted that the house demolished by the authorities did not belong to Javed Mohammad but to his wife Fatima who had received it as gift from her parents even before her marriage. It was mentioned by the petitioners’ lawyer that Parveen Fatima had been paying house tax and water tax from time to time. Even tax receipts were issued in her name.

Advocate Roy contended that the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) did not serve any notice upon the owner of the house but to her husband Mohammad Javed, the activist and businessman who was arrested on June 10 on charges of instigating violent protests against the remarks of former BJP spokesperson over Prophet Mohammad.

In the writ petition, the petitioners have sought compensation and punishment to erring officials. Besides, as an interim measure, they have requested the court to direct the state government to arrange a government accommodation for them till the reconstruction of their house.

In the writ petition, it has been alleged by both petitioners — wife and daughter of Javed — that on June 10, 2022, around midnight they were forcibly taken away by police to Mahila Thana and detained for three days. Accordingly, they have requested the court to direct the state government to pay them compensation for their illegal arrest and detention and for violation of their fundamental rights under Article 21 (protection of right to life and personal liberty) of the Constitution of India.



Comments

Disclaimer : We respect your thoughts and views! But we need to be judicious while moderating your comments. All the comments will be moderated by the newindianexpress.com editorial. Abstain from posting comments that are obscene, defamatory or inflammatory, and do not indulge in personal attacks. Try to avoid outside hyperlinks inside the comment. Help us delete comments that do not follow these guidelines.

The views expressed in comments published on newindianexpress.com are those of the comment writers alone. They do not represent the views or opinions of newindianexpress.com or its staff, nor do they represent the views or opinions of The New Indian Express Group, or any entity of, or affiliated with, The New Indian Express Group. newindianexpress.com reserves the right to take any or all comments down at any time.

flipboard facebook twitter whatsapp