How can state block highway? Open it regulate traffic: SC to Haryana on Shambhu border blockade

The Bench made the observation after Haryana government said they are in process of filing an appeal against the HC's order directing it to open the highway within seven days.
Tractors and trolleys of the protesting farmers parked on a highway over various demands, including a legal guarantee of MSP for crops, at the Punjab-Haryana Shambhu Border on Feb. 22.
Tractors and trolleys of the protesting farmers parked on a highway over various demands, including a legal guarantee of MSP for crops, at the Punjab-Haryana Shambhu Border on Feb. 22.FILE Photo | PTI
Updated on: 
2 min read

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday asked the Haryana government how it can block a highway and directed it to remove the barricading set up at the Shambhu border near Ambala where farmers have been camping since February 13.

The Haryana government had set up barricades at the Ambala-New Delhi national highway in February when Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) (Non-Political) and Kisan Mazdoor Morcha (KMM) had announced to move towards Delhi in support of various demands, including a legal guarantee to minimum support price (MSP) for crops.

A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan made the observation after counsel for Haryana government said the state is in the process of filing an appeal against the high court's July 10 order which directed it to open the highway within seven days.

Tractors and trolleys of the protesting farmers parked on a highway over various demands, including a legal guarantee of MSP for crops, at the Punjab-Haryana Shambhu Border on Feb. 22.
Farmers protest: Punjab and Haryana HC orders removal of barricades at Shambhu border within seven days

"How can a State block a highway? It has a duty to regulate traffic. We are saying open it but regulate," Justice Bhuyan said after the counsel informed the bench about filing the appeal in the apex court.

Justice Kant told the state's counsel, "Why do you want to challenge the high court's order? Farmers are also citizens of this country. Give them food and good medical care. They will come, raise slogans and go back.I think you don't commute by road."

The counsel replied that he travels by road.

The bench said that then he too must be experiencing difficulties.

It also asked the state to file an affidavit on the subsequent developments in the pending matter.

The top court was hearing a plea of the Haryana government challenging a March 7 Punjab and Haryana High Court decision to set up a committee headed by a former high court judge to probe farmer Shubhkaran Singh's death during a clash between the protesting farmers and Haryana security personnel in February.

On April 1, the apex court had refused to stay the high court's order.

Singh, 21, a native of Bathinda, was killed and several police personnel were injured in clashes at Khanauri on the Punjab-Haryana border on February 21.

The incident occurred when some protesting farmers were trying to head towards barricades erected at the border and were stopped by the security personnel from marching to Delhi.

On July 10, the high court ordered the Haryana government to clear within a week the barricading at the Shambhu border.

The court had also said if any law and order situation arises, then the state government could take preventive action according to law.

It had issued a similar direction to the Punjab government for maintaining law and order while stating that any barricading on its side should also be removed.

Related Stories

No stories found.
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com