We may be forced to disassociate with Waqf JPC: Opposition MPs write to LS Speaker

The members urged the Speaker to direct the Chairman of the JPC to have formal consultations with Committee members before taking any decisions.
Image of Opposition MPs boycotting the JPC meeting in New Delhi used for representative purpose.
Image of Opposition MPs boycotting the JPC meeting in New Delhi used for representative purpose.(File Photo | PTI)
Updated on
3 min read

NEW DELHI: In another face-off between the Opposition and the ruling BJP over the Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) examining the Waqf (Amendment) Bill, the Opposition MPs wrote to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla flagging the unilateral decisions by the panel head and warned that they might be forced to disassociate with JPC as they have been stonewalled.

The Lok Sabha has tasked the Jagadambika Pal-led JPC to scrutinise the Waqf Bill after the government introduced it in the Monsoon session of Parliament. The bill has drawn fierce protests from opposition parties and several Muslim organisations. Recently, Union Home Minister Amit Shah asserted that the Waqf Bill will be passed in the upcoming winter session of Parliament.

In the letter, the MPs said that the constitution of JPC, i.e. a mini Parliament should not be treated as a mere ventilating chamber to get the Bill passed as desired by the Union government ignoring the Parliamentary process by using 'majority’ undemocratically.

“Sir, it is respectfully submitted that the Chairman of the Committee used to make unilateral decisions on fixing the dates of sittings even for consecutive three days, where persons/bodies to be called as witnesses, which is not practically possible for MPs to interact with preparation,” it said.

“Hence, it is our duty to bring to your notice with pain that bulldozing the proceedings of the JPC without assigning reasonable and plausible time pause as against the will of the Members is nothing but an act of atrocious onslaught on the Constitutional religion and the Parliament,” it stated.

The members further urged the Speaker to direct the Chairman of the JPC to have formal consultations with Committee members before taking any decisions.

“And to assure the nation that the committee is fair and free in arriving any conclusions on the Bill without any bias and departure from the well established Parliamentary procedures.”

“Otherwise, we humbly submit that we may be forced to disassociate with JPC once and for all as we have been stonewalled,” it added.

The panel will hold a two-day meeting on November 5-6, followed by a five-state tour from November 9. The panel is expected to submit the report during the first week of the winter session of Parliament.

“It may not be out of context to mention here that more than 100 Amendments are made in the newly drafted Bill 2024 as against the claim of only 44 Amendments by the Government. Out of these Amendments, we are reasonably confined to express our fear that the religious, spiritual, and moral fabrics of a legal Institution i.e. Waqf Board is going to be erased which will tarnish our country's image in the eye of the world community on minority rights guaranteed in our Constitution. For aforesaid reasons, the sittings of the Committee must be decided in such a manner with adequate time to discuss and deliberate every clause of the Bill including the legislative competency of the Parliament,” said the letter.

The legal exercise done by the government through the Bill is an attempt to mitigate the earlier legislations made by the Parliament which ensured the secular credentials of the Constitution, pointed out the Opposition members.

“In order to get a consistent legal outcome, the deliberations took place in the Parliament when the erstwhile Acts, were passed in 1995 and 2013, the judicial pronouncement in this regard including lis pendence, deposition of various departments and Muslim organizations going to be made before the JPC must academically as well legally be scrutinized and synchronized after every sitting by the members to understand the discussed issues, which need reasonable time gap between the sittings of the committee.”

“It is needless to say that the legislative wisdom contemplated under the legal Maxim known to our jurisprudence 'lex prospicit non respicit' should be kept in mind,” the letter stated.

Related Stories

No stories found.

X
The New Indian Express
www.newindianexpress.com